The addition of `stream' makes sense to me. What were the arguments against?
(For further pull requests, please include test cases --- which in this case would have caught the use of `stream-empty' instead of `empty-stream'.) At Mon, 5 Dec 2011 16:23:09 -0500, Daniel King wrote: > I initiated a pull request [1] to add a `stream' macro which produces > streams in much the same way the `list' macro does; however, after > speaking with Vincent and Stevie, I'm not sure this is the right > approach. > > I understand that `list' can be used to construct things which can be > used as streams, but I think it's confusing for the user to require > racket/stream and not receive a `stream' macro which functions like > `list'. > > [1] https://github.com/plt/racket/pull/62 > > -- > Dan King > College of Computer and Information Science > Northeastern University _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
