At Thu, 8 Dec 2011 11:58:45 -0600, Robby Findler wrote: > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: > > The addition of `stream' makes sense to me. What were the arguments > > against? > > I don't know that any were articulated yet, but what would be the > difference between 'stream' and 'list'?
The suggested `stream' is a syntactic form whose subexpressions are evaluated lazily. Although there hasn't been much time for comments, I'll push the addition for now; we can take `stream' back out if it's a bad idea. _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev