On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: > Just now, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Neil Van Dyke <n...@neilvandyke.org> wrote: >> > Eli Barzilay wrote at 12/20/2011 01:45 PM: >> > >> >> and there no sane way to debug it other than viewing it in all browsers. >> > >> > Asumu, it seems like you're on a good track, but after you get the >> > layout how you like it in your browser, I don't envy you the >> > cross-browser testing to which Eli refers. :) >> >> Eli, do we have some nicely summarized information about what >> user-agents we see with what frequency? > > That's easy to get, but it won't help much.
I still think it would be interesting if you can provide it. > (As an example why it doesn't: I've reorganized the examples section > at some point to have the text laid out logically for a few vocal > people criticizing how the page rendered in lynx -- yet I don't think > that it would show up in the logs...) I assume `lynx' has an appropriate user-agent string. But on the broader issue, I think it's more important to have a website that looks like we're a serious language that people might use to develop applications in 2011 than one that looks good in lynx. -- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev