At Tue, 20 Dec 2011 13:45:26 -0500, Eli Barzilay wrote: > (c) I'd get rid of the "why racket" section -- I don't see anything > there that doesn't induce yawnage,
I disagree. This paragraph advertizes our high-quality libraries and IDE. Both of these are great selling points, and our current website is silent about them. I also liked that the previous version of Asumu's design mentioned that Racket was both a functional and an OO language. Vincent _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
