Just now, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>
> For `tests', there are currently 3 files with no one responsible at
> the top level:
> - eli-tester.rkt
> - info.rkt
> - run-automated-tests.rkt
>
> I think they should all have you as responsible, and I'll leave the
> dir the way it is. Does that seem reasonable?
Yes.
[Fine for the first (which would eventually move to a proper place),
and for the second (meaningless for drdr, but fine for the janitorial
stuff). I guess that the third is fine for the same reason.]
The obvious problem with a default owner is that new directories get
added and inherit that owner. Also, it would be good to run a script
that checks that all source files are owned.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
