On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: > Just now, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: >> >> For `tests', there are currently 3 files with no one responsible at >> the top level: >> - eli-tester.rkt >> - info.rkt >> - run-automated-tests.rkt >> >> I think they should all have you as responsible, and I'll leave the >> dir the way it is. Does that seem reasonable? > > Yes. > > [Fine for the first (which would eventually move to a proper place), > and for the second (meaningless for drdr, but fine for the janitorial > stuff). I guess that the third is fine for the same reason.]
Done. > The obvious problem with a default owner is that new directories get > added and inherit that owner. Also, it would be good to run a script > that checks that all source files are owned. Yes, that's a good idea. I'll do that. -- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
