At Fri, 9 Mar 2012 17:21:26 -0700, Matthew Flatt wrote: > At Fri, 9 Mar 2012 15:58:11 -0700, Jay McCarthy wrote: > > I just pushed... > > > > - module** > > > > Like module* but combines multiple occurrences of the same submodule > > name into one module* > > I like this direction --- and like everyone, I wish for a better name.
As you probably noticed, we're currently trying out `module+'. I tried out several alternatives, including `submodule', `slice', `facet', `segment', `section', `.section', `at-module', and even `p.s.'; `module+' is the best so far. One big advantage of `module+' is that it avoids inventing a new term, and I think `+' is suggestive of combining multiple bodies into one. Meanwhile, `(submod "..")' is now allowed as a shorthand for `(submod "." "..")'. _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
