> and call it a bunch (inside an 'or', one branch for each of those > strings that are currently in the second argument to member; or well, > even use a for/or, I guess). Or, if you wanted, you could change your > existing code to push the 'or' inside the 'and' and then drop the > promise. >
Ok, I'll rewrite the code without the promise, and push to master.
_________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
