If you're really worried about the allocation, you can work at the snip level and pass in a buffer to be filled in with characters, you know. :)
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Danny Yoo <d...@hashcollision.org> wrote: > >> and call it a bunch (inside an 'or', one branch for each of those >> strings that are currently in the second argument to member; or well, >> even use a for/or, I guess). Or, if you wanted, you could change your >> existing code to push the 'or' inside the 'and' and then drop the >> promise. > > > > Ok, I'll rewrite the code without the promise, and push to master. _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
