We make no commitments about compatibility for 'unstable', so keeping the
collection around shouldn't even be necessary.

Sam
On Dec 3, 2012 8:54 PM, "Ryan Culpepper" <r...@cs.utah.edu> wrote:

> I updated the references in the racket git repo, and I left the
> unstable/lazy-require module in place with a re-export of lazy-require. I
> did remove a feature that didn't seem to be in use (unquote), though, so if
> someone is using lazy-require with unquote outside of the racket git repo,
> that will break.
>
> Ryan
>
>
> On 12/03/2012 07:57 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
>
>> Does the lazy-require move break code?
>>
>> Robby
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:40 PM,  <ry...@racket-lang.org> wrote:
>>
>>> ryanc has updated `master' from 0252207e38 to 33f3574f7e.
>>>    
>>> http://git.racket-lang.org/**plt/0252207e38..33f3574f7e<http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/0252207e38..33f3574f7e>
>>>
>>> =====[ 4 Commits ]=============================**
>>> =========================
>>> Directory summary:
>>>    10.7% collects/racket/
>>>    39.3% collects/unstable/scribblings/
>>>    44.7% collects/unstable/
>>>     5.1% collects/
>>>
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~
>>> [...]
>>>
>>
> _________________________
>  Racket Developers list:
>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/**dev <http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev>
>
_________________________
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Reply via email to