Right, thanks. Somehow I thought it was just in a top-level collection (I didn't read carefully enough).
Sorry, Robby On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > We make no commitments about compatibility for 'unstable', so keeping the > collection around shouldn't even be necessary. > > Sam > > On Dec 3, 2012 8:54 PM, "Ryan Culpepper" <r...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: >> >> I updated the references in the racket git repo, and I left the >> unstable/lazy-require module in place with a re-export of lazy-require. I >> did remove a feature that didn't seem to be in use (unquote), though, so if >> someone is using lazy-require with unquote outside of the racket git repo, >> that will break. >> >> Ryan >> >> >> On 12/03/2012 07:57 PM, Robby Findler wrote: >>> >>> Does the lazy-require move break code? >>> >>> Robby >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:40 PM, <ry...@racket-lang.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> ryanc has updated `master' from 0252207e38 to 33f3574f7e. >>>> http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/0252207e38..33f3574f7e >>>> >>>> =====[ 4 Commits ]====================================================== >>>> Directory summary: >>>> 10.7% collects/racket/ >>>> 39.3% collects/unstable/scribblings/ >>>> 44.7% collects/unstable/ >>>> 5.1% collects/ >>>> >>>> ~~~~~~~~~~ >>>> [...] >> >> >> _________________________ >> Racket Developers list: >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
