Nice, thank you very much. I think I'll gonna use it now. Too bad for the delete key, it would be really useful to me :)
Is it normal that it does not work in the interaction window? Laurent On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu>wrote: > Thanks, Nadeem! > > Robby > > On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Nadeem Abdul Hamid <nad...@acm.org> wrote: > > Some improvements to DrRacket's "automatic parentheses" mode are now > > available in the nightly build version and git repository. If you have > > previous tried auto-parens and abandoned it, or if you have never tried > it, > > please do try it now! > > > > In auto-parens mode, typing a closing parenthesis will skip over an > existing > > one if the cursor is right in front of it. You can also type M+) (meta > key > > + close parens), whether in auto-parens mode or not, to skip right past > the > > closing parentheses of the enclosing expression, or, if the expression is > > not well-balanced, just forward to the next closing parentheses. This > > behavior should also work as expected with other closing parenthesis-like > > symbols, double quotes, and | ... | pairs. There are also some tweaks to > the > > auto-parens mode so that block comments #| ... |# are inserted correctly. > > Also auto-parens mode has no effect when inside a string literal or > comment > > (you can always use M+( to force a parens pair if you really want one) or > > when typing a character literal. > > > > While 'undo' works properly now for just-inserted () pairs in auto-parens > > mode, I did not mess at all with delete key behavior. I've left the > > Paredit-like functionality for another time/person! :-) > > > > Have fun, > > > > nadeem > > > > > > _________________________ > > Racket Developers list: > > http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev > > > _________________________ > Racket Developers list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev >
_________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev