To clarify, because of reasons that I won't go into on the list, the actual chances of me getting this implemented (and of such a change being accepted) are pretty much in the area of "slim to none". TBH, the chances of implementing an `in-url' are low too, but they're probably higher than going into the package system.
40 minutes ago, Laurent wrote: > Ah, that's cool. Looking forward to it! > And the in-url thing would be useful indeed for gists for example. > > Laurent > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 8:32 PM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: > > Yes, I really want to try and get to look into doing this. The > thing is that multi-collection libraries are going to be a > common case for plt packages (which will get pulled out from the > main repository), but the single-collection ones are going to be > the much more popular case elsewhere. > > (And I also still dream on doing some `url-in' to require a > single file, since that's also an important mode of quick > sharing. But that's another story.) -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev