On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote:
> To clarify, because of reasons that I won't go into on the list, the > actual chances of me getting this implemented (and of such a change > being accepted) are pretty much in the area of "slim to none". That's a bummer. At first sight I'd have thought that it would have just been a matter of creating a directory with the same name as the package, and then decompressing the package into that directory. But I guess things are always way more complicated than at first sight... > TBH, > the chances of implementing an `in-url' are low too, but they're > probably higher than going into the package system. > That would be nice, but I'd much much prefer to see the single-collection package thing implemented. Laurent
_________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
