If I get a chance today or tomorrow, I can write some red tests and fix it up. (I'll message here if so). :-)
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 at 18:27 Tim Barham <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Brent - I'll take a look (or get Arzhan to) - looks like a > regression which I would consider release blocking. > > Tim > > ________________________________________ > From: Brent Lintner <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 1:54 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31 > > Kudos on bumping us, Tim! :-D > > -1 (perhaps?) > > Steps I took: > > * Verified `configure` script runs successfully > * Build test (jake build) > * Build with minimization test (jake deploy) > * Ran tests (jake test & jake btest) > * Quick CLI run and sanity check > * jake rat > > BUT: > > ./bin/ripple emulate --remote http://google.com --port 4000 > > Is broken for me. I get: > > ~/Downloads/ripple-emulator-0.9.31-incubating$ ./bin/ripple emulate --port > 2000 --remote http://google.com > Options not understood: emulate --port 2000 --remote http://google.com > > The lib/cli/emulate.js module seems to validate things oddly: > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-ripple/blob/master/lib/cli/emulate.js#L38-L51 > > I am not sure, but it looks like that is the culprit. > > On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 at 10:25 Raymond Camden <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Query - when released - where will it be announced/documented? > > > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon) > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I vote +1: > > > > > > * Verified installation from npm (ripple-emulator@rc) > > > * Reviewed package content and CHANGELOG > > > * Manually verified core 'ripple emulate' functionality for Cordova app > > > * Verified accelerometer plugin and simulation UI works correct > > > > > > Thx! > > > Sergey Grebnov > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Tim Barham [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 1:34 AM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31 > > > > > > Bump! > > > > > > Come one guys - this is an easy one (especially compared to last time), > > and it would be nice to get those bug fixes out. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Tim > > > > > > ________________________________________ > > > From: Tim Barham <[email protected]> > > > Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 6:02 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31 > > > > > > Slight correction to my verification steps: "Manually verified there > > were no new source files that need license headers..." should read: > > "Manually verified the single new source file had an Apache license > > header..." > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Tim Barham [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 5:51 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31 > > > > > > Now that we have 0.9.30 out the door, we need to do another release to > > take some important bug fixes. > > > > > > Please review and vote on the release of Ripple 0.9.31. > > > > > > The package you are voting on is available for review at > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ripple/. It was > > published from its corresponding git tag: > > > > > > incubator-ripple: 0.9.31 (68f124a84a) > > > > > > While we need three +1 *binding* votes (which for an Apache Incubator > > project like Ripple means Apache IPMC members), active Ripple > contributors > > and committers/PPMC members are still encouraged to review the release > and > > vote. Before voting +1, please refer to and verify compliance with the > > checklist at > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list > > (however, we only need to consider changes since the previous release). > > > > > > If you do vote +1, please include the steps you took in order to be > > confident the release meets requirements. > > > > > > Upon a successful vote, I will upload the archive to > > dist/release/incubator/ripple and publish it to NPM. > > > > > > I vote +1: > > > * Verified license headers with Apache RAT (using 'jake rat'). > > > * Manually verified there were no new source files that need license > > headers, nor new third party dependencies that needed to have license > > information included in the LICENSE file. > > > * Verified the build works and all tests pass. > > > * Manually tested all changes that have been made since the last > release. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Tim > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > =========================================================================== > > Raymond Camden, Developer Advocate for MobileFirst at IBM > > > > Email : [email protected] > > Blog : www.raymondcamden.com > > Twitter: raymondcamden > > >
