I'd suggest that you keep it on GitHub, or we bring that and Rio into River at 
the same time.

Regards

Dennis

On Nov 28, 2013, at 1123AM, Greg Trasuk <tras...@stratuscom.com> wrote:

> 
> Hi all:
> 
> A while ago I mentioned that I had taken work on the surrogate container over 
> to Github to try out both git and a Maven-based build.
> 
> It’s now reached an interesting milestone and I’d like to talk about bringing 
> it back into the River project.  Right now, you can startup the container 
> with Reggie and Mahalo in it, plus whatever services you want to add.  The 
> container monitors the deploy directory and starts and stops services much 
> like Tomcat or JBoss auto-deploys.
> 
> You can start up a client program in a client container that manages the 
> codebase server and security environment.  As an example the Maven build 
> includes the service browser.
> 
> Check it out at https://github.com/trasukg/river-container
> 
> Also there’s a ‘hello world’ example at 
> https://github.com/trasukg/river-container-examples
> 
> I’m thinking that this container could be a good entry point for those who 
> wish to create services and clients that run in the Jini environment.  Also, 
> it will make a nice testbed for development of new deployment options, like
> annotation-based service authoring.  I’d like to bring it back into River.  
> It was derived from the surrogate code in skunk/surrogate. Obviously I’m 
> under an ICLA, and all the files have Apache license headers, etc.
> 
> Any opinions on whether it’s a reasonable River sub-project, or whether I 
> should leave it at GitHub?  And if we do bring it into River, would we like 
> to have it in a git repository?  I’m not sure what the state of git support 
> is at Apache - there seems to be several projects using git (especially in 
> the incubator), but the infra webpages still say it’s experimental.  I would 
> see the container as another top-level distribution artifact.  And there’s 
> plenty of development opportunities in making it more user-friendly, 
> administrable, etc.  In all, the goal is to make creation of Jini SOA as 
> approachable as writing servlets.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Greg Trasuk.

Reply via email to