On Nov 28, 2013, at 12:59 PM, Dennis Reedy <dennis.re...@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> On Nov 28, 2013, at 1159AM, Greg Trasuk <tras...@stratuscom.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> I’m all for bringing Rio in at the same time!  It’s good to have choices.  
> 
> Perhaps what we should also focus on is to create (or move forward) either a 
> standard archive (the SAR) or interfaces that define semantics for 
> deployment. That way we can have multiple
> 

Probably a good idea.  The way the river-container (probably needs a new name) 
is architected, we can add additional deployers that use alternate semantics or 
archive formats.  The first one I did handles services that are designed for 
‘com.sun.jini.start’, but there’s no reason we couldn’t add others.  I’m 
already thinking about re-implementing the Harvester-style API.  But even 
that’s looking pretty dated.  That’s what I mean when I say it’ll make a nice 
test bed - for example, I’d really like to be able to do

@Service
@ServiceAttributes( { @Name(“Hello”) })
public class HelloImpl implements Hello {
        public String sayHi(String name) {
                return “Hi there “ + name;
        }
}


>> Is the code provenance clear?
> 
> In some places there are dual copyrights, from (1) Sun Microsystems and (2) 
> to the original author or authors. The NOTICE contains contributions from:
> 
> This product includes material developed by Asarian Technologies LLC.
> 
> This product contains material developed by Elastic Grid LLC.
> (http://www.elastic-grid.com)
> 
> This product includes material developed by Sun Microsystems, Inc.
> (http://www.sun.com).
> 
> This product includes material developed by GigaSpaces, Inc.
> (http://www.gigaspaces.com).
> 

I see it’s Apache licensed.  Ideally we’d have a CCLA in place from all the 
corporate contributors, but I personally don’t know if that’s required if the 
contributed code is ASL2.  We might have to consult more experienced Apache 
people.


Greg.

> 
>> I think we can all agree that telling anyone to start writing services using 
>> only the JTSK is cruel and unusual punishment.
> 
> Indeed.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Dennis
> 

Reply via email to