On 12/19/2013 10:47 PM, Peter wrote:
----- Original message -----
On 12/19/2013 12:16 PM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
<SNIP>
And, using, for example, the strategy you describe of constructing
another object, code can be perfectly valid without using Startable. I
see value in offering the interface, and a rule that the start method
will be called after the constructor for any service implementing it. I
don't think River should assume code is not safe just because it does
not use that feature - it may be safe for entirely different reasons.
I think the quoting got messed up here. The quoted paragraph is material
I wrote in reply to one of of Greg's messages.
Patricia
