Much-deserved easy tak, Peter!
I hope many others on this list share my quiet appreciation for the
massive work you are putting into the codebase.

Dawid


On 22/05/2014 14:08, Peter Firmstone wrote:
> The build will be ready for release when test failures are low, once
> we reach that milestone, we can perform rapid iterative releases.
>
> The recent fix to JERI appears to have increased stability, at least
> locally, although this isn't showing through on Jenkins yet.
>
> You could say I took some time out, to do something easy, at least
> compared to the hair pulling concurrency bugs and race conditions I've
> been focused on.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Peter.
>
> On 22/05/2014 9:31 PM, Bryan Thompson wrote:
>> This is all good, but I would personally be interested in getting to a
>> release based on the QA branch with less remaining development.  I would
>> suggest rapid iterations for releases with incremental change until a QA
>> branch based release is stable.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Peter Firmstone<j...@zeus.net.au> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>     [java] -----------------------------------------
>>>       [java] GENERAL HARNESS CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
>>>       [java]
>>>       [java]    Date started:
>>>       [java]       Thu May 22 11:23:39 UTC 2014
>>>       [java]    Installation directory of the JSK:
>>>       [java]       com.sun.jini.jsk.home=/home/hudson/jenkins-slave/
>>> workspace/river-qa-refactor-j9/trunk
>>>       [java]    Installation directory of the harness:
>>>       [java]       com.sun.jini.qa.home=/home/hudson/jenkins-slave/
>>> workspace/river-qa-refactor-j9/trunk/qa
>>>       [java]    Categories being tested:
>>>       [java]       categories=id loader policyprovider locatordiscovery
>>> activation config discoverymanager joinmanager url iiop jrmp
>>> reliability
>>> thread renewalmanager constraint export lookupdiscovery
>>> servicediscovery io
>>> security lookupservice renewalservice eventmailbox jeri start
>>> discoveryservice discoveryproviders javaspace txnmanager
>>>       [java] -----------------------------------------
>>>       [java] ENVIRONMENT PROPERTIES:
>>>       [java]
>>>       [java]    JVM information:
>>>       [java]       IBM J9 VM, 2.4, 64 bit VM mode
>>>       [java]       IBM Corporation
>>>       [java]    OS information:
>>>       [java]       Linux, 3.2.0-51-generic, amd64
>>>       [java]
>>>       [java] -----------------------------------------
>>>       [java] STARTING TO RUN THE TESTS
>>>       [java]
>>>       [java]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 22/05/2014 9:10 PM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jini has a small but loyal user base in financial services.
>>>>
>>>> Looks like River is building on J9, real time java and IIOP seems
>>>> to be
>>>> working too.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not expecting many tests to pass at this stage, since many
>>>> permissions will be different, at least it's all compilling now.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Peter.
>>>>
>>>> On 22/05/2014 6:53 PM, Dawid Loubser wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Wow Peter, that sounds great! I imagine that a significant
>>>>> percentage of
>>>>> the (rather small) River user base might operate in environments
>>>>> requiring
>>>>> some of these other Java VMs with particular qualities around
>>>>> real-time
>>>>> processing, etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dawid
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 22/05/2014 06:29, Peter Firmstone wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Presently we are prevented from compilling and running on J9,
>>>>>> JRockit
>>>>>> or other Java VM's.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've been able to modify Phoenix to use reflection at runtime to
>>>>>> call
>>>>>> Sun private implementations, meaning that Phoenix is strictly a
>>>>>> Sun JVM
>>>>>> only component, but would no longer prevent compilling and
>>>>>> testing on other
>>>>>> architectures.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is one test that,
>>>>>> com.sun.jini.test.impl.reggie.MultiHomedClientTest
>>>>>> that uses the following internal sun API:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> sun.net.spi.nameservice.NameService;
>>>>>> sun.net.spi.nameservice.NameServiceDescriptor;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If I was to change this test and associated classes to .txt
>>>>>> extensions,
>>>>>> we could run these manually on Sun's JVM, while allowing River to
>>>>>> build on
>>>>>> other architectures.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to