Greg, Wow, I really liked the other link(s) better. Are there commits pending? All I see is the browser, and I don't think the browser is at all a good reference for an example. Is that where you're going?
Thanks Dennis > On Jan 8, 2015, at 916PM, Greg Trasuk <[email protected]> wrote: > > Misfired on the url below. The project at > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/river/river-examples/river-examples/trunk is > straight River, not the github url below. > > Cheers, > > Greg Trasuk > > On Jan 8, 2015, at 9:12 PM, Greg Trasuk <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On Jan 8, 2015, at 8:17 PM, Dennis Reedy <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> I don't know if pushing your River container approach is best for an >>> example, but a stock River example with straight forward conventions allows >>> developers to understand how to structure a project, how to build it, and >>> most importantly how to test it. Without those basic fundamentals of an >>> example it doesn't make much sense to pursue. >>> >> >> I’m not pushing the river container here. The project in >> https://github.com/trasukg/river-container-examples is straight River, with >> the one caveat that (as we discussed on the list a few weeks ago) I have >> pulled out the old com.sun.jini.start package to a different project, which >> is at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/river/river-rt-tools/trunk', and >> renamed it to ‘org.apache.river.tools.rt.start’. I only mentioned the river >> container examples to show that we’re in basic agreement on how to structure >> a project that implements a service and client. >> >> Now if you ask me, the convoluted structure of a Starter-based project makes >> its own argument for a container, but that’s a whole different conversation. >> >> But in any case, I’ll try to add the actual client and service examples into >> the examples project in the next few days, and then I think you’ll see that >> we’re really not disagreeing very much. I’m planning on yer basic >> ‘hello-world’ service. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Greg Trasuk >
