+1 The old examples do more harm than good.
On 9/15/2015 12:54 PM, Bryan Thompson wrote:
+1 on removing the old examples.
----
Bryan Thompson
Chief Scientist & Founder
SYSTAP, LLC
4501 Tower Road
Greensboro, NC 27410
br...@systap.com
http://blazegraph.com
http://blog.bigdata.com <http://bigdata.com>
http://mapgraph.io
Blazegraph™ <http://www.blazegraph.com/> is our ultra high-performance
graph database that supports both RDF/SPARQL and Tinkerpop/Blueprints
APIs. Blazegraph is now available with GPU acceleration using our disruptive
technology to accelerate data-parallel graph analytics and graph query.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and its contents and attachments are
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and are confidential or
proprietary to SYSTAP. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure,
dissemination or copying of this email or its contents or attachments is
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
the sender by reply email and permanently delete all copies of the email
and its contents and attachments.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Dennis Reedy <dennis.re...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Greg,
Agree 100% with the old examples. BTW, I am working on an example (extends
on what you have already created) that uses River 3.0, Gradle and the
Groovy configuration approach. I thought it might be a good idea to show
how one could use Gradle in addition to Maven. The project includes
integrated JUnit testing as well as support for starting reggie and the
browser from the Gradle project (no need for external scripts).
For now, I’ve put it up on GitHub (
https://github.com/dreedyman/apache-river-example), you’ll need to build
and install River 3.0 for it to work. It still needs work, you’ll see your
webapp-client there as well.
Regards
Dennis
On Sep 15, 2015, at 227PM, Greg Trasuk <tras...@stratuscom.com> wrote:
I notice that Dennis just added a pom for the browser to the “River
3.0”/ qa-refactor-namespace branch.
The examples, including the browser, are pretty confusing and
out-of-date in the main JTSK distribution. I would suggest removing them,
since we have a separate examples project. We’d have to do another version
of the examples home build that calls out the River 3.0 jars.
In other words, let’s improve the newbie experience by pointing people
to a better set of examples that doesn’t require new developers to build
the entire JTSK. I suggest simply deleting the examples folder from the
starter kit.
Also, is somebody going to merge back to trunk at some point?
Cheers,
Greg Trasuk
