That's correct, it's not at a stage where it's building yet.
On 7/7/2020 1:50 AM, Dennis Reedy wrote:
I'm wondering if I'm missing a step here. This is what I've done:
1. svn checkout http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/river/jtsk/modules
2. cd modules/modularize/apache-river
3. mvn package
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[ERROR] [ERROR] Some problems were encountered while processing the POMs:
[WARNING] The expression ${pom.version} is deprecated. Please use
${project.version} instead. @
[ERROR] Child module
/Users/dreedy/projects/apache-river/modules/modularize/apache-river/phoenix-activation
of
/Users/dreedy/projects/apache-river/modules/modularize/apache-river/pom.xml
does not exist @
[ERROR] Child module
/Users/dreedy/projects/apache-river/modules/modularize/apache-river/river-logging
of
/Users/dreedy/projects/apache-river/modules/modularize/apache-river/pom.xml
does not exist @
@
[ERROR] The build could not read 1 project -> [Help 1]
[ERROR]
[ERROR] The project org.apache:river:3.0-SNAPSHOT
(/Users/dreedy/projects/apache-river/modules/modularize/apache-river/pom.xml)
has 2 errors
[ERROR] Child module
/Users/dreedy/projects/apache-river/modules/modularize/apache-river/phoenix-activation
of
/Users/dreedy/projects/apache-river/modules/modularize/apache-river/pom.xml
does not exist
[ERROR] Child module
/Users/dreedy/projects/apache-river/modules/modularize/apache-river/river-logging
of
/Users/dreedy/projects/apache-river/modules/modularize/apache-river/pom.xml
does not exist
[ERROR]
[ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with
the -e switch.
[ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
[ERROR]
[ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
please read the following articles:
[ERROR] [Help 1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/ProjectBuildingException
Is this what I should expect?
On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 2:41 PM Phillip Rhodes
<motley.crue....@gmail.com <mailto:motley.crue....@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 8:07 AM Peter Firmstone
<peter.firmst...@zeus.net.au <mailto:peter.firmst...@zeus.net.au>>
wrote:
>
> Hi Phil,
>
> I've been going through your patch, you've got a lot of work
done in a
> short time. :)
>
> I've just committed your changes.
>
> I'll have a look at the circular dependencies and see what I can
do in
> the coming week.
Sounds good. I may also be able to free up some time to work on that
some more. I thought I'd try slowly moving classes back to their
original locations, from where I moved them to river-lib, and try to
isolate the absolute smallest number of classes that are circularly
dependent.
Although it may turn out that you, or somebody else who knows this
code better, may be able to just jump in and quickly work it all out.
Hopefully that will be the case, and will moot the need for the
exercise described above. :-)
In any case, all of this is good for me as far as getting familiar
with the River code in general.
Phil
