Hi Dennis, I wanted to resurrect this thread to see how things are going with the migration and to see what, if any, help you needed.
~Jeremy On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 11:04 PM Peter Firmstone < peter.firmst...@zeus.net.au> wrote: > Hi Dennis, > > Did you want to commit your Gradle build changes to trunk? > > Cheers, > > Peter. > > On 16/02/2021 7:19 am, Peter Firmstone wrote: > > Hi Dennis, > > > > Yes & No, this is a module Gradle build of trunk, looking forward to > > some contribution from you on that front. We're currently trying to > > figure out how to move other components of the project, such as the > > site, ldj tests and other contributions. > > > > Perhaps we should move http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/river/jtsk/ now, > > then people who want to focus on trunk can proceed, eg the gradle > > build and then move the remaining parts of > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/river/ later? > > > > > > artwork/ <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/river/artwork/> *1069292* > > <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/river/artwork/?view=log> 10 years > > gmcdonald River now a TLP > > attic/ <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/river/attic/> *1069292* > > <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/river/attic/?view=log> 10 years > > gmcdonald River now a TLP > > extra/ <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/river/extra/> *1069292* > > <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/river/extra/?view=log> 10 years > > gmcdonald River now a TLP > > jtsk/ <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/river/jtsk/> *1884639* > > <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/river/jtsk/?view=log> 8 weeks > > peter_firmstone replace trunk with modules branch > > ldj-tests/ <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/river/ldj-tests/> *1234443* > > <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/river/ldj-tests/?view=log> 9 years > > peter_firmstone River-32 The Jini spec tests inside the qa suite > > used used to be called tck, so… > > permission_delegates/ > > <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/river/permission_delegates/> *1394888* > > <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/river/permission_delegates/?view=log> 8 > > years peter_firmstone upload delegate implementations > > river-examples/ <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/river/river-examples/> > > *1694732* > > <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/river/river-examples/?view=log> 5 > > years gtrasuk [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next > > development iteration > > river-rt-tools/ <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/river/river-rt-tools/> > > *1645730* > > <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/river/river-rt-tools/?view=log> 6 > > years gtrasuk Start package now references the correct > > message bundle, and can start the brows… > > site/ <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/river/site/> *1827149* > > <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/river/site/?view=log> 2 years > > zkuti - alerts for helping hands - long due changes in people > > added - success stories … > > doap_river.rdf > > <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/river/doap_river.rdf?view=log> > > > > Regards, > > > > Peter. > > > > On 16/02/2021 6:19 am, Dennis Reedy wrote: > >> I did this conversion a while ago, does this help? > >> https://github.com/dreedyman/apache-river > >> <https://github.com/dreedyman/apache-river> > >> > >> Regards > >> > >> Dennis > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 2:44 PM Dan Rollo <danro...@gmail.com > >> <mailto:danro...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Peter, > >> > >> Silly questions to follow. > >> > >> I found the empty repo at: river-ldj-tests.git > >> <https://git.apache.org/repos/asf/river-ldj-tests.git > >> <https://git.apache.org/repos/asf/river-ldj-tests.git>> > >> (https://git.apache.org/repos/asf/river-ldj-tests.git > >> <https://git.apache.org/repos/asf/river-ldj-tests.git>) > >> > >> As a sanity check: Is the one to migrate from?: > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/river/jtsk/trunk > >> <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/river/jtsk/trunk> > >> > >> While I agree refactoring of the project structure into separate, > >> stand alone git repos would be an improvement, I’m wondering if a > >> safer first step would be to move the svn repo to git as is? That > >> way, we start from a working state in git, and preserve all the > >> svn history. From there, we can start to “break things” (literally > >> and figuratively) into smaller repos. The underlying assumption is > >> just about everything will be easier to do (merging, etc) with a > >> git repo. > >> > >> Either way, I’ll start looking for lines along which I could break > >> things. > >> > >> Dan > >> > >> > >> > On Feb 9, 2021, at 3:42 AM, Peter Firmstone > >> <peter.firmst...@zeus.net.au <mailto:peter.firmst...@zeus.net.au>> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > Thanks Dan, > >> > > >> > https://infra.apache.org/svn-to-git-migration.html > >> <https://infra.apache.org/svn-to-git-migration.html> > >> > > >> > https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/newrepo.html > >> <https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/newrepo.html> > >> > > >> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/river/ > >> <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/river/> > >> > > >> > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#river > >> <https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#river> > >> > > >> > I just created a git repository for the "Apache river JiniTM > >> Technology Lookup, Discovery, and Join Compatibility Kit", I > >> figure it might be easier to start with something that's had > >> relatively few commits as an experiment. > >> > > >> > But basically everything we have on svn needs to be broken up > >> into separate projects, typical of what people are used to seeing > >> on github. > >> > > >> > The QA test suite is an ant build project, it's currently part > >> of trunk, but I was thinking of separating it out into it's own > >> build. > >> > > >> > On 9/02/2021 12:31 pm, Dan Rollo wrote: > >> >> Hi Peter, > >> >> > >> >> I’m apologize for not being more help. I haven’t had much time > >> of late. Is there a thread I could pull regarding the Git > >> migration? Where to start? > >> >> > >> >> The plan you itemize makes sense to me. > >> >> > >> >> Dan Rollo > >> >> > >> >>> On Feb 8, 2021, at 8:35 PM, Peter Firmstone > >> <peter.firmst...@zeus.net.au <mailto:peter.firmst...@zeus.net.au>> > >> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> Hello River folk, > >> >>> > >> >>> There's an upcoming board report due shortly, I wanted to > >> gauge people's interest in the project. > >> >>> > >> >>> We've got two pending tasks: > >> >>> > >> >>> 1. SVN to Git Migration > >> >>> 2. Website migration > >> >>> > >> >>> Following the Git Migration, the plan is to continue with the > >> modular build, using gradle? > >> >>> > >> >>> Lately we don't have a lot of participation, I was hoping that > >> we would have some more buy in, especially with the Git migration. > >> >>> > >> >>> I don't want to be making decisions alone, are there people on > >> this list who have time to assist, are willing to assist or intend > >> to do so in future when they have time? > >> >>> > >> >>> -- > >> >>> Regards, > >> >>> Peter Firmstone > >> >>> > >> > -- > >> > Regards, > >> > Peter Firmstone > >> > > >> > -- > Regards, > > Peter Firmstone > 0498 286 363 > Zeus Project Services Pty Ltd. > > -- Jeremy R. Easton-Marks "être fort pour être utile"
