Hi Von,
> Thanks for your conclusion, we could use the email to discuss the question > more frequently :-) > Definitely! We can. IMO, we could scope the implementation of the exchange type for AMQP > firstly, direct and topic may be a better priority. Yes, because both of them have a wide use case. So we can choose those two. > Besides, I am wonder how to maintain the mapping relationship between AMQP > and RocketMQ Message Model in your design, could you make it clear for me? > Yes I'll explain my thoughts via diagram , in detail very soon. Anyway, I think design is the most significant, we must think again before > we begin to code. > With in two days I'll share the whole project design of mine in this thread.Currently I am working on it. Thanks. Best regards, R.Kasthuriraajan. -- R.Kasthuriraajan. Undergraduate student | Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Science | University of Jaffna. LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ratnasingam-kasthuriraajan-2a6892121/ <https://www.linkedin.com/in/ratnasingam-kasthuriraajan-2a6892121/> stackoverflow: https://stackoverflow.com/users/8870269/kasthuriraajan?tab=profile GitHub: https://github.com/kasthuriraajan Medium: https://medium.com/@Kasthuriraajan
