Hi Ding, The storage of ACL is primarily kept locally in the Broker, and there are > two main options: file storage and RocksDB-based storage. In this case, > RocksDB is used for storage, while file storage is provided as an example > for reference purposes.
Either embedded RocksDB or yaml file is stored per node. This raises two concerns: how the metadata will be propagated to newly added nodes? How to avoid partial failure and resulting inconsistency among nodes? There are consensus efforts ongoing, will this this feature be built on top of them? Li Zhanhui On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 8:32 PM qiaoao <qiao...@foxmail.com> wrote: > Good to know! Will the ACL 2.0 support ACL in NameServer? > > > 2023年11月15日 19:50，丁双喜 <dingshuangxi...@gmail.com> 写道： > > > > Hi, RocketMQ Community > > > > RocketMQ ACL is crucial for ensuring the security of message data. We aim > > to enhance its capabilities and are preparing to upgrade it to a newer > > version. > > > > We have written the proposal and you can see it by the link below: > > https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/7560 > > > > Please reply to this email if you have any questions > > Best Regards > >
