OK, I'll keep them as-is.

Glen


On 07/29/2014 07:14 AM, Dave wrote:
-1 original names for these much more clear, no need to change.

- Dave



On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Glen Mazza <[email protected]> wrote:

Team, we have three permission rights when we invite someone to join a
blog: admin (becomes a co-owner of blog, can do anything including delete
the blog), author (can publish blog entries and moderate comments, but not
alter the blog's design), and "limited" (can save as draft blog articles
but can't publish them -- someone else has to review the draft and then
publish.)  I'm wondering if we should rename "limited" to "drafter".
  Although "drafter" as a person who writes drafts is not a common usage of
this term, the access rights that "drafter" provides is clearer than
"limited" and doesn't have as much a negative connotation to an employee
assigned this role that "limited" has.

This is just a GUI change, the internal codes saved to the database in
roller_permissions (admin, post, edit_draft) will remain the same.

Also, the menu item "Members" on our Preferences Tab (which contains
Settings | Members | Pings | Maintenance), which contains the list of
people authorized to work on the blog along with their roles, I'm inclined
to rename to a more active-sounding "Co-Bloggers"--or is that too informal?
  WDYT?

Thanks,
Glen



Reply via email to