Hi Justin, It seems to me like Surrey agreed to the request which was explicit that it included relicensing to the Apache License. If you feel that another more explicit response is required then please go ahead and make that effort.
Regards, Dave > On Oct 1, 2017, at 9:29 PM, Justin Mclean <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > >> If you have an issue please be very, very clear in your next email precisely >> what you have issue with. Be meticulous. Filenames, etc. > > The off list conversion can be found here [1]. You can see that while > permission to relicense was asked for it was not explicitly given only > permission to modify and adapt the code from AMF99 to AMF3. The original > source license hasn’t changed. > > The file in question was referenced in my original email [2] as was the file > it was based on [3]. The original GPL code that it was based on can be found > here [4] (you’ll need to download it to view it). > > Thanks, > Justin > > 1. https://github.com/emilkm/amfjs/issues/17 > 2. > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/66cc5a3daae1ee9f02264e36cb90b197953c96a9/frameworks/projects/Network/src/main/flex/org/apache/flex/net/remoting/amf/AMFBinaryData.as > 3. https://github.com/emilkm/amfjs/blob/master/amf.js > 4. https://code.google.com/archive/p/r-amf/source/default/source
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
