Pretty sure that Flash Builder will be looking for
flex-sdk-description.xml.
It might be that Flash Builder users will have to run an Ant script to
fully set up their SDKs and we could use that to rename a
royale-sdk-description file.
Thoughts?
-Alex
On 10/14/17, 1:58 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>There is a mismatch in this file:
>
><flex-sdk-description>
> <name>Apache Flex ${project.version} FP${flash.version}
>AIR${air.version} en_US</name>
> <!--version>${project.version}</version-->
> <!-- This is a hack to trick the FlashBuilder in accepting this version
>-->
> <version>4.8.${project.version}</version>
> <build>${timestamp}</build>
></royale-sdk-description>
>
>I’m not sure which is a mistake, but eh opening tag of
>flex-sdk-description does not match the closing tag of
>royale-sdk-description
>
>I’m wondering whether Flash Builder will recognize royale-sdk-description.
>
>Harbs
>
>> On Oct 7, 2017, at 12:21 AM, aha...@apache.org wrote:
>>
>> diff --git a/distribution/src/main/resources/flex-sdk-description.xml
>>b/distribution/src/main/resources/flex-sdk-description.xml
>> index a4bf265..099982c 100644
>> --- a/distribution/src/main/resources/flex-sdk-description.xml
>> +++ b/distribution/src/main/resources/flex-sdk-description.xml
>> @@ -23,4 +23,4 @@
>> <!-- This is a hack to trick the FlashBuilder in accepting this
>>version -->
>> <version>4.8.${project.version}</version>
>> <build>${timestamp}</build>
>> -</flex-sdk-description>
>> +</royale-sdk-description>
>
