Pretty sure that Flash Builder will be looking for flex-sdk-description.xml.
It might be that Flash Builder users will have to run an Ant script to fully set up their SDKs and we could use that to rename a royale-sdk-description file. Thoughts? -Alex On 10/14/17, 1:58 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >There is a mismatch in this file: > ><flex-sdk-description> > <name>Apache Flex ${project.version} FP${flash.version} >AIR${air.version} en_US</name> > <!--version>${project.version}</version--> > <!-- This is a hack to trick the FlashBuilder in accepting this version >--> > <version>4.8.${project.version}</version> > <build>${timestamp}</build> ></royale-sdk-description> > >I’m not sure which is a mistake, but eh opening tag of >flex-sdk-description does not match the closing tag of >royale-sdk-description > >I’m wondering whether Flash Builder will recognize royale-sdk-description. > >Harbs > >> On Oct 7, 2017, at 12:21 AM, aha...@apache.org wrote: >> >> diff --git a/distribution/src/main/resources/flex-sdk-description.xml >>b/distribution/src/main/resources/flex-sdk-description.xml >> index a4bf265..099982c 100644 >> --- a/distribution/src/main/resources/flex-sdk-description.xml >> +++ b/distribution/src/main/resources/flex-sdk-description.xml >> @@ -23,4 +23,4 @@ >> <!-- This is a hack to trick the FlashBuilder in accepting this >>version --> >> <version>4.8.${project.version}</version> >> <build>${timestamp}</build> >> -</flex-sdk-description> >> +</royale-sdk-description> >