The VS Code extension requires flex-sdk-description too. I think we should include both flex-sdk-description and royale-sdk-description for now. We can deprecate flex-sdk-description at some point in the future, but I think we should try and make the migration as painless as possible for now.
Harbs > On Oct 16, 2017, at 1:29 AM, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote: > > Pretty sure that Flash Builder will be looking for > flex-sdk-description.xml. > > It might be that Flash Builder users will have to run an Ant script to > fully set up their SDKs and we could use that to rename a > royale-sdk-description file. > > Thoughts? > -Alex > > On 10/14/17, 1:58 PM, "Harbs" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> There is a mismatch in this file: >> >> <flex-sdk-description> >> <name>Apache Flex ${project.version} FP${flash.version} >> AIR${air.version} en_US</name> >> <!--version>${project.version}</version--> >> <!-- This is a hack to trick the FlashBuilder in accepting this version >> --> >> <version>4.8.${project.version}</version> >> <build>${timestamp}</build> >> </royale-sdk-description> >> >> I’m not sure which is a mistake, but eh opening tag of >> flex-sdk-description does not match the closing tag of >> royale-sdk-description >> >> I’m wondering whether Flash Builder will recognize royale-sdk-description. >> >> Harbs >> >>> On Oct 7, 2017, at 12:21 AM, [email protected] wrote: >>> >>> diff --git a/distribution/src/main/resources/flex-sdk-description.xml >>> b/distribution/src/main/resources/flex-sdk-description.xml >>> index a4bf265..099982c 100644 >>> --- a/distribution/src/main/resources/flex-sdk-description.xml >>> +++ b/distribution/src/main/resources/flex-sdk-description.xml >>> @@ -23,4 +23,4 @@ >>> <!-- This is a hack to trick the FlashBuilder in accepting this >>> version --> >>> <version>4.8.${project.version}</version> >>> <build>${timestamp}</build> >>> -</flex-sdk-description> >>> +</royale-sdk-description> >> >
