Nope. It is not a casing problem.

I can confirm that any additional "royale" argument in the "flex compiler" 
panel breaks code-assist (it also triggers the realtime processor error when 
you "apply" the settings).

I also tried to use an additional config file (using -load-config argument with 
the += syntax) but if the additional config file contains a Royale argument 
(js-output, for example) it triggers an "uncaught compiler exception".

Nicolas Granon



> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Piotr Zarzycki [mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com]
> Envoyé : samedi 4 novembre 2017 03:32
> À : dev@royale.apache.org; ngra...@idylog.com
> Objet : Re: FB : Strange side effects of -js-output argument
> 
> Nicolas,
> 
> Try to write exactly as I provide you -targets=JSRoyale or -
> compiler.targets=JSRoyale
> 
> Piotr
> 
> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017, 23:34 Idylog - Nicolas Granon <ngra...@idylog.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > Even more :
> >
> > When you add *any* royale argument to the "compiler arguments"
> dialog,
> > it breaks code-assist !!
> >
> > I just added -targets=jsroyale to the compiler arguments (no
> > -js-output
> > argument) and it also breaks code-assist !!!
> > (moreover, it does not seem to work : the swf is output as well..)
> >
> > Something out there really needs a fix...
> >
> > Nicolas Granon
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Message d'origine-----
> > > De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID] Envoyé : vendredi
> > > 3 novembre 2017 18:01 À : dev@royale.apache.org; ngra...@idylog.com
> > > Objet : Re: FB : Strange side effects of -js-output argument
> > >
> > > Yeah, I noticed that too.  I think FB is running its own compiler
> > > for code-assist and new compiler options break that internal
> > > compiler.  I'm planning to dig into it more next week.  It might be
> > > that some compiler options have to be specified inside -config.xml
> files.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 11/3/17, 7:59 AM, "Idylog - Nicolas Granon" <ngra...@idylog.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >Ok, thanks.
> > > >
> > > >Nicolas Granon
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> -----Message d'origine-----
> > > >> De : Piotr Zarzycki [mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com]
> > > >> Envoyé : vendredi 3 novembre 2017 15:40 À :
> dev@royale.apache.org
> > > >> Objet : Re: FB : Strange side effects of -js-output argument
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi Nicolas,
> > > >>
> > > >> Current compiler targets is "JSRoyale" for JS only output.
> > > >>
> > > >> Piotr
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> 2017-11-03 15:30 GMT+01:00 Idylog - Nicolas Granon
> > > >> <ngra...@idylog.com>:
> > > >>
> > > >> > (my setup : FlashBuilder 4.7, Windows, Apache Royale 0.9
> > > >> > binaries)
> > > >> >
> > > >> > In some of my previous posts, I have tried to explain how to
> > > >> > setup FB and also the problems I got with code-assist
> > > >> > (auto-complete)
> > > not
> > > >> > working properly.
> > > >> > I also suggested a "working" setup of FB.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Now, I have a *very* strange issue :
> > > >> >
> > > >> > If I add "-js-output=somepath" to the compiler arguments (from
> > > >> > "Project > Properties > Flex compiler" tab), code-assist is
> > > >> > lost
> > > !!!!
> > > >> > (almost entirely). (side note : the project compiles without
> > > >> > errors, and output is in fact directed to (somepath)).
> > > >> >
> > > >> > If I remove the argument, code-assist is back ! (of course,
> > > >> > output is directed to the bin/js-debug inside the project
> > > >> > folder as it
> > > >> > should)
> > > >> >
> > > >> > My flex-config.xml is the one that ships with the binaries
> > > >> distribution.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > The project is a basic "hello world" project (one view, one
> > > label).
> > > >> > The js-output folder name has no spaces in it.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Note that when *adding" the -js-output parameter and
> validating
> > > the
> > > >> > dialog, I get a "realtime error processor" from FB. After
> > > >> > closing and restrarting FB, that error disappears, but it
> > > >> > clearly shows that some active process get lost in the dark...
> > > >> > I suspect the active
> > > >> "realtime"
> > > >> > process is code-assist.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Is it possible that the handling of this argument changes
> > > something
> > > >> > inside the internal paths used by FB for the current project
> ???
> > > >> Maybe
> > > >> > it is just a matter of "restoring" the changed values after
> the
> > > >> > compiler runs ???
> > > >> >
> > > >> > And while I am at it, what are the *current* (0.9) values for
> -
> > > >> targets
> > > >> > argument for js output ? (JS ? RoyaleJS ? JSRoyale ? JSFlex
> > > >> > ???)
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Nicolas Granon
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >>
> > > >> Piotr Zarzycki
> > > >>
> > > >> mobile: +48 880 859 557
> > > >> skype: zarzycki10
> > > >>
> > > >> LinkedIn:
> > >
> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fww
> > > >>w.l
> > > i
> > > >>nke
> > >
> >>din.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Caa45f87d335d49441da608d5
> > > >>22c
> > > b
> > > >>958
> > >
> >>7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636453180140754807&
> > > >>sda
> > > t
> > > >>a=u
> > > >>7DZ4xxyJZls0CwbS8Tx6sI3uDn5p26h4c99xv4vuTk%3D&reserved=0
> > > >>
> > >
> >><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpl.
> > > l
> > > >>ink
> > > >>edin.com%2Fin%2Fpiotr-zarzycki-
> > > 92a53552&data=02%7C01%7C%7Caa45f87d335d
> > > >>494
> > >
> >>41da608d522cb9587%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636
> > > >>453
> > > 1
> > > >>801
> > >
> >>40911063&sdata=FEbuvYXGHKlY4nXGjXgo4t7W4HwKtdM9A7gMHfxM%2BKU%3D&re
> > > >>ser
> > > v
> > > >>ed=
> > > >>0>
> > > >>
> > > >> GitHub:
> > >
> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg
> > > >>ith
> > > u
> > > >>b.c
> > >
> >>om%2Fpiotrzarzycki21&data=02%7C01%7C%7Caa45f87d335d49441da608d522c
> > > >>b95
> > > 8
> > > >>7%7
> > >
> >>Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636453180140911063&sda
> > > >>ta=
> > > G
> > > >>TnQ
> > > >>7nenut8qnMUFTbA53QR6nVmRXsdpvPlb0D%2FSqtU%3D&reserved=0
> > > >
> >
> >
> >

Reply via email to