It's not such a big issue for now : what I have done is, I have a small eclipse
plug-in that can copy files from workspace to another destination after compile.
Since we have other (non Royale) files to copy to the http server anyway...
Your suggestion (adding the js-output argument in flex-config.xml) is
interesting, but what is the proper syntax ???
I have tried :
<js-output>
<path-element>/myoutputdir<path-element>
</js-output>
But it does not work. Should there be a <path-element/> subtag ? Or maybe it
should have another name ? (or no subtag at all ?)...
Nicolas Granon
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> Envoyé : samedi 4 novembre 2017 15:26
> À : dev@royale.apache.org; ngra...@idylog.com
> Objet : Re: FB : Strange side effects of -js-output argument
>
> Piotr, Nicolas,
>
> As I said a few posts ago, I will look into it next week (probably
> Thursday), when I can try to set up a debug environment with the FB
> source code. I'm not able to do it now. The code-hinting system seems
> to not care that the default flex-config.xml has these new options, so
> you might be able to add your new options there as a workaround for
> now.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 11/4/17, 1:12 AM, "Idylog - Nicolas Granon" <ngra...@idylog.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Nope. It is not a casing problem.
> >
> >I can confirm that any additional "royale" argument in the "flex
> >compiler" panel breaks code-assist (it also triggers the realtime
> >processor error when you "apply" the settings).
> >
> >I also tried to use an additional config file (using -load-config
> >argument with the += syntax) but if the additional config file
> contains
> >a Royale argument (js-output, for example) it triggers an "uncaught
> >compiler exception".
> >
> >Nicolas Granon
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Message d'origine-----
> >> De : Piotr Zarzycki [mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com]
> >> Envoyé : samedi 4 novembre 2017 03:32 À : dev@royale.apache.org;
> >> ngra...@idylog.com Objet : Re: FB : Strange side effects of
> >> -js-output argument
> >>
> >> Nicolas,
> >>
> >> Try to write exactly as I provide you -targets=JSRoyale or -
> >> compiler.targets=JSRoyale
> >>
> >> Piotr
> >>
> >> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017, 23:34 Idylog - Nicolas Granon
> >> <ngra...@idylog.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Even more :
> >> >
> >> > When you add *any* royale argument to the "compiler arguments"
> >> dialog,
> >> > it breaks code-assist !!
> >> >
> >> > I just added -targets=jsroyale to the compiler arguments (no
> >> > -js-output
> >> > argument) and it also breaks code-assist !!!
> >> > (moreover, it does not seem to work : the swf is output as well..)
> >> >
> >> > Something out there really needs a fix...
> >> >
> >> > Nicolas Granon
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > > -----Message d'origine-----
> >> > > De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID] Envoyé :
> >> > > vendredi
> >> > > 3 novembre 2017 18:01 À : dev@royale.apache.org;
> >> > > ngra...@idylog.com Objet : Re: FB : Strange side effects of
> >> > > -js-output argument
> >> > >
> >> > > Yeah, I noticed that too. I think FB is running its own
> compiler
> >> > > for code-assist and new compiler options break that internal
> >> > > compiler. I'm planning to dig into it more next week. It might
> >> > > be that some compiler options have to be specified inside
> >> > > -config.xml
> >> files.
> >> > >
> >> > > -Alex
> >> > >
> >> > > On 11/3/17, 7:59 AM, "Idylog - Nicolas Granon"
> >> > > <ngra...@idylog.com>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > >Ok, thanks.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >Nicolas Granon
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >> -----Message d'origine-----
> >> > > >> De : Piotr Zarzycki [mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com]
> >> > > >> Envoyé : vendredi 3 novembre 2017 15:40 À :
> >> dev@royale.apache.org
> >> > > >> Objet : Re: FB : Strange side effects of -js-output argument
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Hi Nicolas,
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Current compiler targets is "JSRoyale" for JS only output.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Piotr
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> 2017-11-03 15:30 GMT+01:00 Idylog - Nicolas Granon
> >> > > >> <ngra...@idylog.com>:
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> > (my setup : FlashBuilder 4.7, Windows, Apache Royale 0.9
> >> > > >> > binaries)
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > In some of my previous posts, I have tried to explain how
> to
> >> > > >> > setup FB and also the problems I got with code-assist
> >> > > >> > (auto-complete)
> >> > > not
> >> > > >> > working properly.
> >> > > >> > I also suggested a "working" setup of FB.
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > Now, I have a *very* strange issue :
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > If I add "-js-output=somepath" to the compiler arguments
> >> > > >> > (from "Project > Properties > Flex compiler" tab),
> >> > > >> > code-assist is lost
> >> > > !!!!
> >> > > >> > (almost entirely). (side note : the project compiles
> without
> >> > > >> > errors, and output is in fact directed to (somepath)).
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > If I remove the argument, code-assist is back ! (of course,
> >> > > >> > output is directed to the bin/js-debug inside the project
> >> > > >> > folder as it
> >> > > >> > should)
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > My flex-config.xml is the one that ships with the binaries
> >> > > >> distribution.
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > The project is a basic "hello world" project (one view, one
> >> > > label).
> >> > > >> > The js-output folder name has no spaces in it.
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > Note that when *adding" the -js-output parameter and
> >> validating
> >> > > the
> >> > > >> > dialog, I get a "realtime error processor" from FB. After
> >> > > >> > closing and restrarting FB, that error disappears, but it
> >> > > >> > clearly shows that some active process get lost in the
> dark...
> >> > > >> > I suspect the active
> >> > > >> "realtime"
> >> > > >> > process is code-assist.
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > Is it possible that the handling of this argument changes
> >> > > something
> >> > > >> > inside the internal paths used by FB for the current
> project
> >> ???
> >> > > >> Maybe
> >> > > >> > it is just a matter of "restoring" the changed values after
> >> the
> >> > > >> > compiler runs ???
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > And while I am at it, what are the *current* (0.9) values
> >> > > >> > for
> >> -
> >> > > >> targets
> >> > > >> > argument for js output ? (JS ? RoyaleJS ? JSRoyale ? JSFlex
> >> > > >> > ???)
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > Nicolas Granon
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> --
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Piotr Zarzycki
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> mobile: +48 880 859 557
> >> > > >> skype: zarzycki10
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> LinkedIn:
> >> > >
> >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fww
> >> > > >>w.l
> >> > > i
> >> > > >>nke
> >> > >
> >> >>din.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Caa45f87d335d49441da608d5
> >> > > >>22c
> >> > > b
> >> > > >>958
> >> > >
> >> >>7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636453180140754807&
> >> > > >>sda
> >> > > t
> >> > > >>a=u
> >> > > >>7DZ4xxyJZls0CwbS8Tx6sI3uDn5p26h4c99xv4vuTk%3D&reserved=0
> >> > > >>
> >> > >
> >>
> >><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpl.
> >> > > l
> >> > > >>ink
> >> > > >>edin.com%2Fin%2Fpiotr-zarzycki-
> >> > > 92a53552&data=02%7C01%7C%7Caa45f87d335d
> >> > > >>494
> >> > >
> >> >>41da608d522cb9587%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636
> >> > > >>453
> >> > > 1
> >> > > >>801
> >> > >
> >> >>40911063&sdata=FEbuvYXGHKlY4nXGjXgo4t7W4HwKtdM9A7gMHfxM%2BKU%3D&re
> >> > > >>ser
> >> > > v
> >> > > >>ed=
> >> > > >>0>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> GitHub:
> >> > >
> >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg
> >> > > >>ith
> >> > > u
> >> > > >>b.c
> >> > >
> >> >>om%2Fpiotrzarzycki21&data=02%7C01%7C%7Caa45f87d335d49441da608d522c
> >> > > >>b95
> >> > > 8
> >> > > >>7%7
> >> > >
> >> >>Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636453180140911063&sda
> >> > > >>ta=
> >> > > G
> >> > > >>TnQ
> >> > > >>7nenut8qnMUFTbA53QR6nVmRXsdpvPlb0D%2FSqtU%3D&reserved=0
> >> > > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >
