Hi Om, Great idea ! :) I will add this one to my To Do list :)
Thanks! Piotr 2017-11-15 20:13 GMT+01:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <[email protected]>: > At some point, we could do things like create a pom.xml based on the > features they want. For example, the Spring Boot project has this page: > https://start.spring.io/ > where you could go select the functionalities you want and download the > pom.xml. Then you simply run mvn install, and everything is setup for you > automatically. > > With npm, we already have Josh's yeoman project which can be further > tweaked to make it an interactive functionality selection process, which > would in turn generate the appropriate workspace files. > > We could also have a github repo with various starter packs, that support > various functionalities and IDEs. > > Stuff volounteers can start working on today :-) > > Thanks, > Om > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Alex Harui <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi Carlos, > > > > IMO, it is a classic trade-off problem. It makes sense that many people > > want to know exactly what libraries (and versions of those libraries) are > > being used in the recipe for their app. And, similarly, some people want > > to know exactly what code is being used in their app and will start with > > the Basic set and add beads. > > > > Flex became popular because it improves developer productivity, and > > hopefully Royale will too, and just like many people have expressed a > > desire for the Express set, others just want to create a new project, > type > > a few lines of MXML and AS and have it build. > > > > In the IDE packages, all SWCs are available without any configuring. I > > think that's actually true in the Maven archetypes as well. > > > > Explicitness and granularity generally take more time and thus are often > > traded off against getting something up and running quickly. I believe > > that with Royale, we are giving folks more choices in more places. Our > > "getting started" content will probably use Express components and IDE > > packaging or an archetype with all or most SWCs in the POM. But folks > > will be able to use Basic and explicit SWC dependencies in their POMs if > > they want to. > > > > My 2 cents, > > -Alex > > > > On 11/15/17, 9:53 AM, "[email protected] on behalf of Carlos > Rovira" > > <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: > > > > >Hi, > > > > > >I must recognize that I'm not fully understand what's the problem. > > > > > >If you use a Royale class to load data, you know it should link > > >Network.swc, To get html controls you use HTML.swc. > > >you want binding? so you refer to Binding.swc. > > > > > >For me this is completely natural. > > > > > >People working with an API must learn the that API, the classes implied, > > >and how is structured. > > > > > >I feel that not doing this could bring to a lots of unused code and > > >libraries and maybe will not affect the final weight or load times, but > > >for > > >sure the size of the project and the management will be affected since > it > > >could carry things that are never needed. > > > > > >Again, most of this things is not critical, and can be part of the way > > >each > > >one see development, but want to explain this so people could fully > > >understand the goods of maven. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >2017-11-15 17:27 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <[email protected]>: > > > > > >> Harbs, > > >> > > >> While technically, it is true that for Royale, the pom.xml files need > to > > >> have the right SWCs specified, I think if we maintain the archetypes > > >>then > > >> when you create a new Maven project for an app you will get every SWC > > >> specified in your POM, and I don't think there is an issue for having > > >>more > > >> SWCs than you actually need in your POM. > > >> > > >> Getting the right SWCs in the POM is more of an issue for the > framework > > >> build since we do care about what SWCs depend on other SWCs and the > > >>order > > >> we build them. > > >> > > >> What I still dream about is ways of automating these things. So that > if > > >> someone adds a new SWC in frameworks/projects, they don't also have to > > >> remember to update the archetypes. And similarly, the duplication of > > >> settings in the POMs for the SWCs and the -config.xml files for the > > >>SWCs. > > >> > > >> Of course, I could be wrong... > > >> -Alex > > >> > > >> On 11/15/17, 3:16 AM, "Harbs" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >> >> why too error-prone? > > >> > > > >> >Because it requires users to know which classes are in which swc. I > > >>don’t > > >> >see a reason for that. But, I’m not a Maven user, so take my thoughts > > >> >with a grain of salt. > > >> > > > >> >Harbs > > >> > > > >> >> On Nov 15, 2017, at 12:54 PM, Carlos Rovira < > [email protected] > > > > > >> >>wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> Hi Harbs, > > >> >> > > >> >> why too error-prone? If you are developing a Royale app with Maven > > >>you > > >> >> create a pom, and you add libraries on demand. So your build is > > >>totally > > >> >> automated and you only need your project pom in the future and not > > >> >>manually > > >> >> check if libraries are the required ones or not. I see just the > > >>opposite > > >> >> and less error prone. > > >> >> > > >> >> I know this is lastly a question on how each looks to ways to do > > >>things, > > >> >> but I use to look at how others are doing things and I think most > of > > >>the > > >> >> projects at Apache are using maven as their way to build their > > >>projects > > >> >>and > > >> >> manage continuous integration, so it must be a safe way to do thing > > >>or > > >> >> maven will be less used today. > > >> >> > > >> >> In my experience, I'm using a macbookpro and setup the environment > > >>is a > > >> >> breeze. Using Hombrew just need to bring to a new system java, git, > > >> >>maven > > >> >> and from there I get all downloaded and built. maven downloads only > > >> >>what is > > >> >> needed and I don't need to worry about it. Even don't need to set > up > > >> >> environment variables, what's so cool :) > > >> >> > > >> >> just my 2ctnms > > >> >> > > >> >> C. > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> 2017-11-15 11:04 GMT+01:00 Harbs <[email protected]>: > > >> >> > > >> >>> The original topic was npm, but since we’re talking about Maven… > ;-) > > >> >>> > > >> >>> It seems to me that Royale should have a single Maven artifacts > > >> >>>dependency > > >> >>> that users should be able to specify which pulls in all the > possibly > > >> >>>needed > > >> >>> swcs. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Maybe I’m missing something, but from the maven examples I’ve > seen, > > >>it > > >> >>> looks like you need to specify which swcs are needed for them to > be > > >> >>>pulled > > >> >>> in. That seems too error-prone. > > >> >>> > > >> >>>> On Nov 15, 2017, at 11:52 AM, Piotr Zarzycki > > >> >>>><[email protected]> > > >> >>> wrote: > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> In case of Maven artifacts the only needs of doing one build is > for > > >> >>>> convenient people who are using Maven build to develop SDK > itself. > > >>If > > >> >>> I'm a > > >> >>>> user whom would like to use Royale and build my own application > by > > >> >>>>Maven > > >> >>> I > > >> >>>> don't need download repository and build myself whole sources. I > > >>just > > >> >>> need > > >> >>>> to create simple pom file and all artifacts will be downloaded > from > > >> >>> Apache > > >> >>>> Maven central - my application will build. > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> Piotr > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> 2017-11-15 10:46 GMT+01:00 Harbs <[email protected]>: > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>>> +1 > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> I think this is the simplest way to handle it. > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> The only downside is that folks who don’t need the framework > will > > >> >>> download > > >> >>>>> more than they need. but hard-drive space is pretty cheap and > like > > >> >>> Carlos > > >> >>>>> says, we can split if afterwards if there’s demand. > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>>> On Nov 15, 2017, at 11:38 AM, Carlos Rovira > > >> >>>>>><[email protected]> > > >> >>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> Hi, > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> I prefer : > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> * only one vote thread > > >> >>>>>> * compiler bundled (no release separately) - if people demand > > >>it, we > > >> >>>>> always > > >> >>>>>> can do that > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> about maven, I remember there's 3 separate builds due to how > > >>maven > > >> >>>>>>make > > >> >>>>>> things, I'd like someone with maven skills could finaly join > the > > >> >>>>>>three > > >> >>>>> into > > >> >>>>>> one, that was something Chris was planning to do. The final > step > > >> >>>>>>would > > >> >>> be > > >> >>>>>> making only one "mvn clean install" and have compiler, typedefs > > >>and > > >> >>> asjs > > >> >>>>>> compiled and ready > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> thanks > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> 2017-11-15 9:09 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <[email protected] > >: > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> Hi Piotr, > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> That's fine, we'll see what others think, but we are also > > >> >>>>>>>discussing > > >> >>>>>>> whether the compiler is a separate release and vote thread or > is > > >> >>> bundled > > >> >>>>>>> with the framework. > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> -Alex > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> On 11/15/17, 12:03 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" > > >><[email protected] > > >> > > > >> >>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> Hi, > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> Yep we didn't decide it yet how should be package release. In > > >>my > > >> >>>>> opinion > > >> >>>>>>>> this should look like that: > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> 1) Package called royale-flexjs -0.9 Where it compiles to SWF > > >>and > > >> >>>>>>>>JS > > >> >>>>>>>> 2) Package called royale-0.9 where it compiles to JS only. > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> I like the idea of voting once where whole framework is in > > >>place, > > >> >>>>>>>>in > > >> >>>>> case > > >> >>>>>>>> of Maven during release process three repositories will land > as > > >> >>> staging > > >> >>>>>>>> artifacts and we can vote. > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> Thoughts ? > > >> >>>>>>>> Piotr > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> 2017-11-15 8:09 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui > > >><[email protected]>: > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> Royale will be using artifacts from royale-compiler, not > > >> >>> flex-falcon. > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> I'm not sure we've decided on how to package our releases. > > >>The > > >> >>>>>>>>>Ant > > >> >>>>>>>>> scripts are currently set up for two artifacts (compiler and > > >> >>>>> framework), > > >> >>>>>>>>> Maven is set up for 1 or 3, depending how you count. > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> I'm pretty sure we'll have to adjust scripts anyway to > smooth > > >>out > > >> >>> how > > >> >>>>>>>>> Maven and Ant work together to create all of the artifacts > so > > >> >>>>>>>>>making > > >> >>>>>>>>> other > > >> >>>>>>>>> adjustments for npm is an option too. Maybe the first > > >>question > > >> >>>>>>>>>is: > > >> >>>>> how > > >> >>>>>>>>> many vote threads do we want? I believe eventually we rate > of > > >> >>> change > > >> >>>>> in > > >> >>>>>>>>> royale-compiler will slow compared to royale-asjs and > changes > > >>to > > >> >>>>>>>>> royale-asjs won't depend on changes in royale-compiler, but > we > > >> >>>>>>>>>could > > >> >>>>>>>>> change our packaging and number of vote threads later. > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> Thoughts? > > >> >>>>>>>>> -Alex > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> On 11/14/17, 10:44 PM, "[email protected] on behalf of > > >>OmPrakash > > >> >>>>>>>>> Muppirala" <[email protected] on behalf of > > >>[email protected]> > > >> >>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> I'm in the middle of updating the npm scripts. Are we > > >>planning > > >> >>>>>>>>>>to > > >> >>>>>>>>>> continue > > >> >>>>>>>>>> to download flex-falcon from the current release? Or are > we > > >> >>> planning > > >> >>>>>>>>> on > > >> >>>>>>>>>> pushing out a new release of falcon/royale-compiler? > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >> >>>>>>>>>> Om > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Alex Harui > > >> >>>>> <[email protected] > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I was going to copy it someday so go ahead and do it > > >>now > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>if > > >> >>> you > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> have > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> time. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> -Alex > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> On 11/13/17, 12:50 AM, "Harbs" <[email protected]> > > >>wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds good. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 13, 2017, at 10:41 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, I just realized that we don't have a > royale-utilities > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>git > > >> >>>>>>>>> repo. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> I > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> am > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> tempted to simply put the npm related code into > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>royale-asjs/npm > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> directory > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and add it as an exclude in the build.xml. Any > > >>objections? > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Om > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Harbs > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>><[email protected]> > > >> >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you call it 0.10.0, I think it’s pretty clear. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 12, 2017, at 11:46 PM, Idylog - Nicolas Granon > < > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In developer's eyes, "0.10" is "lower" than "0.9". > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You'd better number it as "0.91". > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nicolas Granon > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -----Message d'origine----- > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> De : Harbs [mailto:[email protected]] > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Envoyé : dimanche 12 novembre 2017 10:15 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> À : [email protected] > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Objet : Re: Publishing royale to npm > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We’ve fixed a lot of things since 0.8. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9 does not need to jump to 1.0. We can have 0.10 > (and > > >> >>> 0.11…) > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’d really like to streamline the release process so > > >>it’s > > >> >>>>>>>>> painless > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough to release every couple/few weeks. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Harbs > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 12, 2017, at 10:35 AM, Carlos Rovira > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about version number, I'll feel more happy with 0.8 > > >>than > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>0.9 > > >> >>>>>>>>> My > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is that we are getting a first release of Royale and > > >>is > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the > > >> >>>>>>>>> same > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FlexJS 0.8 but with some new fixes and little > things. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As well I can see many things to do to reach 1.0, > and > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>would > > >> >>> be > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> great > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to have still an intermediate release 0.9 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-11-11 22:10 GMT+01:00 OmPrakash Muppirala > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Alex Harui > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That might work. One question: we want the same > > >>bits > > >> >>> that > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> were > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> published > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as 0.9.0-rc1 to become the final bits where you > > >>would > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>do: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> npm install -g apache-royale > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We aren't supposed to rebuild anything. For Maven > > >>the > > >> >>> same > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> bits > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from staging get copied to Maven central, for > > >>Ant/IDE > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the > > >> >>>>>>>>> same > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bits > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are moved (not copied) from dist/dev to > > >>dist/release. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>So > > >> >>>>>>>>> is it > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> true > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that the RM > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> publish the final bits by taking the same bits > that > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>were > > >> >>>>>>>>> once > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> published via > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> npm publish --tag 0.9.0-rc1 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as the final release? What does the RM to do make > > >>that > > >> >>>>>>>>> happen? > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> npm publish > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without any tag? > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The rc1 would be in the /dev/ area of the dist > site. > > >> We > > >> >>> will > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> use a > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> useMirror=false flag while attempting to download > the > > >> >>>>>>>>> specified > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sdk. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This will bypass the mirror urls and directly load > it > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>from > > >> >>>>>>>>> the > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> dist > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> site. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For the nightlies, it would be similar, except we > can > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>use > > >> >>> the > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> direct > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> url of the lastSuccessfulArtifact directory in > > >>Jenkins. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When the release candidate artifacts get promoted > to > > >>GA, > > >> >>> they > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> will > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> available via mirrors. So, we will push a new > > >>release > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>to > > >> >>> npm > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> with > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the new version number, which simply is new > > >>package.json > > >> >>> file > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> with > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the correct paths to the sdk artifacts. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I plan to write a script called: publish-to-npm > which > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>can > > >> >>> be > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> invoked > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./publish-to-npm -- -nightly=true version=0.9.0 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> ./publish-to-npm -- > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -rc=true version=0.9.0 ./publish-to-npm -- -ga=true > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> version=0.9.0 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The script will take care of setting up the correct > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>values > > >> >>> in > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> package.json and will publish it to npmjs.org. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The values would be: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nightly: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "royale_path_binary": " > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks. > > protection.outlook.com/?url=ht > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> tp%3A%2F%2Fapac > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> heflexbuild.cloudapp.net% > 3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs- > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> jsonly%2F&data=0 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2%7C01%7C%7Cca49c65bbd2148ea650d08d52a7397a5% > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636461598305881412&sdata= > > ylxu8v > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> MGUA5zpWu1NTEza > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nAGYLIn3ERTln%2FhNy4O6tY%3D&reserved=0 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/out/ > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ", > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "royale_file_name": > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"apache-royale-jsonly-0.9.0-bin.zip", > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "useMirror": false > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This will be published as: npm publish --tag > nightly > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "royale_path_binary": " > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks. > > protection.outlook.com/?url=ht > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> tps%3A%2F%2Fdis > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> t.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist% > > 2Fdev%2Froyale%2Fsdk%2F0. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 9.0%2Frc1%2F&da > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ta=02%7C01%7C%7Cca49c65bbd2148ea650d08d52a7397a5% > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b3443879 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% > 7C636461598305881412&sdata= > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> IgVMA61I1w4N3spjL > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> t76o%2BSIicrxnwIlYNB9yMSFElQ%3D&reserved=0", > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "royale_file_name": > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"apache-royale-jsonly-0.9.0-bin.zip", > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "useMirror": false > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This will be published as: npm publish --tag > > >>0.9.0-rc1 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GA: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "royale_path_binary": > "/dist/release/royale/sdk/0.9. > > >> 0/", > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "royale_file_name": > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"apache-royale-jsonly-0.9.0-bin.zip", > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "useMirror": true > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This will be published as: npm publish > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When we move to the next version, we need to up the > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>version > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> number > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the next one and push a nightly tag out. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> P.S. All this assumes that there are no changes in > > >>the > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> packaging > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> logic. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Om > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seems reasonable for the RM to have Node.js and > npm > > >> >>>>>>>>> installed. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/9/17, 6:28 PM, "[email protected] on behalf > > of > > >> >>>>>>>>> OmPrakash > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Muppirala" > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] on behalf of > > >>[email protected]> > > >> >>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For staging builds, we could do : > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Publish: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> npm publish --tag 0.9.0-rc1 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Install: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> npm install -g [email protected] > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For nightly builds > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Publish: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> npm publish --tag nightly > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Install: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> npm install -g apache-royale@nightly > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts? > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, if we want to integrate this as part of our > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>release > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> process, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Release Manager will need to have node.js and > > >>npm > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> installed > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Om > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Alex Harui > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What would be great is, when we push artifacts > to > > >> Maven > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> staging > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repos and dist/dev, we also push something to > > >> wherever > > >> >>> we > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> need > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> push it so npm works. Then we say in the vote > > >> emails: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maven: Use these staging 'coordinates' in your > > >> pom.xml > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Ant/IDE > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> users: Get artifacts from dist.a.o/dev/royale > NPM > > >> >>> users: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Run > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> npm > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <whatever> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But these may not be the final bits so we want > to > > >> make > > >> >>>>>>>>> sure > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> folks > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know that and that we can push final bits later. > > >> Then > > >> >>>>>>>>> when > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> the > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> finally > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> passes, the RM pushes the Maven artifacts to > Maven > > >> >>>>>>>>> Central, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> the > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ant/IDE > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> packages go to dist.a..o/release/royale and we > do > > >> >>>>>>>>> whatever is > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> needed > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> npm. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Similarly, for nightly builds, we tell Maven > > >>users to > > >> >>> use > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -SNAPSHOT versions, we tell Ant/IDE users to get > > >>it > > >> from > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apacheflexbuild. What can we tell npm users? > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/9/17, 2:37 PM, "[email protected] on > behalf > > >>of > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> OmPrakash > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Muppirala" > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] on behalf of > > >>[email protected] > > >> > > > >> >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Alex Harui > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you remind me what the issues are with npm > > >>and > > >> >>>>>>>>> nightly > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> builds? > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IOW, I > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would think we would want to automate the > > >> generation > > >> >>> of > > >> >>>>>>>>> the > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HPM > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it can go out with the regular Apache release > > >> >>> artifacts > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> and be > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tested as > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an RC by release voters. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think there is any issue. Those who > > >>want to > > >> >>> test > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> out > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nightly > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> via npm, need to a few special steps before > they > > >>run > > >> >>> npm > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> install. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> added that functionality a while ago. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are talking about the official release so we > > >>can > > >> >>> push > > >> >>>>>>>>> the > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> package > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> out > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the npm registry. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We could also publish alpha/beta releases to > npm > > >>as > > >> >>> well. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We already need to synchronize the generation > > >>and > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> deployment > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maven > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> artifacts as well as the Ant/IDE artifacts. > > >>Can we > > >> >>> add > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> NPM as > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well? > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, we should be able to incorporate an npm > > >>publish > > >> >>>>>>>>> command > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> our release scripts. Do you know at what point > > >>in > > >> the > > >> >>>>>>>>> whole > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will be able to update npm? > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If we dont change the installation steps, we > > >>would > > >> need > > >> >>>>>>>>> the > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following pieces in the package.json file: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "org_apache_flex": { > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "flexjs_path_binary": > > >>"flex/flexjs/0.8.0/binaries/", > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "flexjs_file_name": > > >>"apache-flex-flexjs-0.8.0-bin. > > >> >>> zip", > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "falcon_path_binary": > > >>"flex/falcon/0.8.0/binaries/", > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "falcon_file_name": > "apache-flex-falconjx-0.8.0- > > >> >>>>>>> bin.zip", > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "flash_player_global_url": " > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http%3A%2F%2Fdownload.m > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>acromedia.com%2Fget%2Fflashplayer%2Fupdaters%2F25% > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cb85 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 038114e2f4ee32aba08d527c2918b% > > >> >>>>>>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> C636458638974117812&sdata=Pf% > > >> >>> 2Fx4OLzd65wh8OEeXC8ALh3LE% > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2BBvUQGD6Ksts2pl14% > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3D&reserved=0", > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "flash_player_global_file_name": > > >> >>> "playerglobal25_0.swc", > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "adobe_air_url": > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>"https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > https%3A%2F%2Fna01.sa > > >>felinks&data=02%7C01%7C%7Caf4775cf81744f38c00a08d52c51 > > f49b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34 > > >>438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636463652865787019& > > sdata=C%2FphpKLRr7wtRU5 > > >>DnjuYJ7viknT7C6L%2B4pPyleyqx%2FE%3D&reserved=0. > > >> protection.outlook.com/?url= > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http%3A%2F%2Fairdownlo > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad.adobe.com%2Fair%2Fwin% > > >> 2Fdownload%2F25.0%2F&data=02% > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7C01%7C%7Cb85038114e > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2f4ee32aba08d527c2918b% > > >> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636458 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> 638974117812&sdata=dVNDap4qsl6i7zZ1uL% > > >> 2FIiqKexCBpPPx86eqgDmslTPY% > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3D& > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reserv > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ed=0", > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "adobe_air_file_name": "AdobeAIRSDK.zip", > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "player_version": "25.0", > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "swf_version": "36", > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "swf_object_url": > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>"https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > https%3A%2F%2Fna01.sa > > >>felinks&data=02%7C01%7C%7Caf4775cf81744f38c00a08d52c51 > > f49b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34 > > >>438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636463652865787019& > > sdata=C%2FphpKLRr7wtRU5 > > >>DnjuYJ7viknT7C6L%2B4pPyleyqx%2FE%3D&reserved=0. > > >> protection.outlook.com/?url= > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> m%2Fswfobject%2Fswfobject% > > >> >>> 2Farchive%2F&data=02%7C01%7C% > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7Cb85038114e2f4ee32 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aba08d527c2918b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364586389741 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17812&sdata=gWVzkp0ByA8WM8SUI4pbDOKgs5omcr > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VHBnIJsy2pfQU%3D&reserved=0", > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "swf_object_file_name": "2.2.zip", > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "flatui_url": > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>"https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > https%3A%2F%2Fna01.sa > > >>felinks&data=02%7C01%7C%7Caf4775cf81744f38c00a08d52c51 > > f49b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34 > > >>438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636463652865787019& > > sdata=C%2FphpKLRr7wtRU5 > > >>DnjuYJ7viknT7C6L%2B4pPyleyqx%2FE%3D&reserved=0. > > >> protection.outlook.com/?url= > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> om%2Fdesignmodo%2FFlat-UI% > > >> >>> 2Farchive%2F&data=02%7C01%7C% > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7Cb85038114e2f4ee32 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aba08d527c2918b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364586389741 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17812&sdata=nD8nezQSa9GnubwK8frZlJepgEY7zf > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dCuMRqPbC3jqM%3D&reserved=0", > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "flatui_file_name": "2.2.2.zip" > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> } > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then, we up the version number and do a npm > > >>publish. > > >> >>> The > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manager > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would need to have the credentials for > npmjs.org > > , > > >> but > > >> >>> we > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> could > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> share > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with [email protected] > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Om > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/9/17, 1:28 PM, "Harbs" < > > >> [email protected]> > > >> >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK. You’re probably right. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2017, at 9:34 PM, OmPrakash > > >>Muppirala > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Harbs > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Did you reserve the name yet? > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No I did not. If we are going to be using > > >> >>>>>>>>> apache-royale > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> as > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> package > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> name, we should be fine. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unless you are worried someone else might > > >>claim > > >> it? > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2017, at 9:25 PM, OmPrakash > > >>Muppirala > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Carlos > > >>Rovira > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Om, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm working on the website content and > > >>want to > > >> >>> know > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> about > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NPM > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> update > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pages with real info. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could you share your plans about > releasing > > >> Apache > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Royale > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NPM? > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suppose you can't still make this due > to > > >> some > > >> >>>>>>>>> final > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> renaming? > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let me know in order to remove this info > if > > >> you > > >> >>>>>>>>> think > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we'll > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> need > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to get Royale on NPM > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was hoping to release the npm version > > >>right > > >> >>> after > > >> >>>>>>>>> we > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> do > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of royale. Does that work? > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Om > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-30 19:57 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think apache-royals would be better, > > >>since > > >> >>>>>>>>> avoids > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> confusing > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> came to this project for the first time, > > >>and > > >> try > > >> >>>>>>>>> to > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> search > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> npm, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "royale", although this was the right > and > > >> only > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> package, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ask > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there's the right one. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With apache-royale, there's no confusion > > >> >>> problems > > >> >>>>>>>>> ;) > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-30 19:50 GMT+01:00 OmPrakash > > >> Muppirala > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We always have option of using > > >> apache-royale as > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> package > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> name. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Harbs > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It’s a shame that “royale” seems to > > >> already be > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> taken > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> npm. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would vote for two packages: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. To install *everything* (i.e. swf, > > >>js, > > >> >>> node, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> etc. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> future > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> targets > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when/if we add them): > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> npm install apache-royale -g > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. To install js-only: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> npm install apache-royale-js -g > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If we see a demand for further > packages > > >> (i.e. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> compiler > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only), > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> add > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them as additional packages later. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Harbs > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 30, 2017, at 8:23 PM, > OmPrakash > > >> >>>>>>>>> Muppirala < > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, "npm install" downloads a > tarball > > >> from > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> npmjs.org > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> . > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> package > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usually > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contains the code we want others to > > >> use. It > > >> >>>>>>>>> also > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contains > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "package.json" > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file which specify all its > > >>dependencies. > > >> >>> These > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sub-dependencies) are all downloaded > > >>from > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> npmjs.org > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> as > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> part > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "npm > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> install". > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are options to run custom > > scripts > > >> >>> before > > >> >>>>>>>>> and > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> npm > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> install. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In the case of FlexJS, we run a > script > > >> >>>>>>>>> afterwards > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> that > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simply > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloads > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> our > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-npmjs.org dependencies (royale > > sdk, > > >> >>> fonts, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> flash > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> player, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> air, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.) > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> puts them in the correct places. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, our options are: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Publish two different packages > on > > >> >>>>>>>>> npmjs.org: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jsonly > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> js+swf. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> need to figure out the names of > these > > >> >>> packages, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> since > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unique > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> identifiers on npmjs's registry. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then the command the users would run > > >> would > > >> >>> look > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> like: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> npm install royale-jsonly -g npm > > >>install > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> royale-js-and-swf -g > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Publish only the jsonly package. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then the command the users would run > > >> would > > >> >>> look > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> like: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> npm install royale-jsonly -g > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Possibly, we can figure out a > way > > >>to > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> optionally > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> download > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> swf > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> support. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This way, by default the jsonly is > > >> downoaded > > >> >>>>>>>>> and > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unzipped. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (possibly) look at the args or have > > the > > >> user > > >> >>>>>>>>> run > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> another > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> command > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloads the swf support. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then the command the users would run > > >> would > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> (possibly) > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> npm install royale -- > > >> -include-swf-support -g > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (or) > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> npm install royale-jsonly -g and > then > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./update-royale-include-swf-support > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In all three cases, we can > definitely > > >> run a > > >> >>>>>>>>> script > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alters > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xml > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configs, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc. to suit our needs. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hope that helps. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Om > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:20 AM, > Alex > > >> Harui > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Om, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you explain to us what our > > options > > >> are? > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Essentially, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JS-only > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> package will be a subset of a > package > > >> that > > >> >>> can > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> output > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SWF > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JS > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will probably have slightly > different > > >> >>> default > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> settings > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> example, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> frameworks/royale-config.xml file. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is looking like we can create a > > zip > > >> >>> package > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> for > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JS-only > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in Moonshine and VSCode, but to > fully > > >> make > > >> >>> it > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> work > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> in > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flash > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Builder > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maybe some other IDEs) you will > need > > >>to > > >> run > > >> >>> a > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> script > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sort > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixes up some FB launch > > configurations > > >> that > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> convert > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flex projects > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Royale projects. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The current plan for a "FlexJS" > > >>package > > >> that > > >> >>>>>>>>> has > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> SWF > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> support > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (for > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> users > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that want use SWF for testing or > as a > > >> >>>>>>>>> migration > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> step) > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> require > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> users unzip a package and run an > Ant > > >> script > > >> >>> to > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> bring > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Adobe > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies. I'm thinking we > won't > > >> use the > > >> >>>>>>>>> Flex > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> installer. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm still working through why one > of > > >>our > > >> >>> users > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> isn't > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> getting > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> completion working in FB and the > > >>answer > > >> >>> there > > >> >>>>>>>>> may > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> affect packaging > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know NPM well enough to > have > > >>an > > >> >>>>>>>>> opinion > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> on, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distribute > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> two > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> packages (flexjs-with-swf-support > and > > >> >>>>>>>>> js-only), > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whether > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NPM > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> allows > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us to > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have two different packages or > > whether > > >> it is > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> better > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> structure > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NPM > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases as js-only package and a > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> swf-support-add-on > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> package. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I also don't know if the NPM > install > > >> should > > >> >>>>>>>>> run a > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> script > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixes > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those launch configs. Maybe it is > > >> better to > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> continue > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leave > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "FB > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> users have to run this additional > Ant > > >> >>> script" > > >> >>>>>>>>> or > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not sure how important FB still is > to > > >> our > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ease-of-migration > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> story. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe showing us what folks would > > have > > >> to > > >> >>>>>>>>> type on > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> the > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> command > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> might > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help us form opinions. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts? > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/30/17, 4:36 AM, " > > >> >>>>>>> [email protected] > > >> >>>>>>>>> on > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> behalf > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rovira" > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] on behalf > of > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Om, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think that would be great! > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If we end having multiple products > > as > > >> Alex > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have as well multiple NPM > installs. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So for me is ok to sync products > we > > >> >>> deliver > > >> >>>>>>>>> with > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> NPM > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> installations > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flavors > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-30 10:58 GMT+01:00 Yishay > > >>Weiss > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You’re likely to do most of the > > >> >>> maintenance > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> work, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it’s > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you… > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> far as users go there are some > > users > > >> >>> writing > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> client > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code in > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIR > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code in node (in fact I’m > involved > > >>in > > >> >>> such a > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now). > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wouldn’t make sweeping > assumptions. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________ > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: [email protected] < > > >> >>> [email protected]> > > >> >>>>>>>>> on > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> behalf > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OmPrakash > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Muppirala <[email protected]> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2017 > > >> 10:21:37 > > >> >>> AM > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Publishing royale to > > >>npm > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 1:19 AM, > > >>Harbs > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why not publish both versions? > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It looks like the js only is > going > > >>to > > >> be > > >> >>>>>>>>> just a > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> zip > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> makes > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> easy maintenance. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The swf version has a bunch of > > >> >>> dependencies > > >> >>>>>>>>> to > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> be > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloaded. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not a big deal, just thinking out > > >>loud > > >> >>> if we > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> really > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> need to > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> publish > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> two > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different packages that might > lead > > >>to > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> confusion. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm open to both, though. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Om > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 30, 2017, at 10:15 AM, > > >> OmPrakash > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Muppirala > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was wondering if we should > > >>publish > > >> >>> the > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache.royale-jsonly > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> verson > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> via > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> npm instead of the full version > > >>with > > >> >>> swf > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> support. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After all, users coming in vial > > >>npm > > >> >>> would > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> most > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> likely > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expect > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> swf > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> support. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts on this proposal? > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Om > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > >> >>>>>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fna01.sa > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>felinks.protec&data=02%7C01%7C%7C859800f0fbdd4084543408d52bf4 > > >> >>>>>>>>> 6f9e%7Cfa7b1 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636463251207266855& > > >> >>>>>>>>> sdata=chGRPGjMNW > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> nMjfD2vsZzKoqSMsvCKMprnmnRTa63cfU%3D&reserved=0 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> tion.outlook.com/?url= > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.codeo > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scopic.com&data=02%7C01%7C% > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7C5f3b122f189e4e0f119b08d51f8a > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 81b0%7Cfa7b1b5a7b > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> %7C636449602097009881& > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sdata=wZgQd0X2xX6ed8y0 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> t4O87r66gMlVy%2F8aHqtpwnq8O6w% > > >> >>> 3D&reserved=0> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos Rovira > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Director General > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> M: +34 607 22 60 05 > > >> <607%2022%2060%2005> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > >> >>>>>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fna01.saf > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>elinks.protect&data=02%7C01%7C%7C859800f0fbdd4084543408d52bf4 > > >> >>>>>>>>> 6f9e%7Cfa7b1 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636463251207266855& > > >> >>>>>>>>> sdata=YGZuHz4tyz > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> GDA8AL0PTMc6Edb8fN8wRKegPMLmUiNvU%3D&reserved=0 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> ion.outlook.com/?url= > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.codeos > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> copic.com&data=02%7C01%7C% > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7C5f3b122f189e4e0f119b08d51f8a > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 81b0%7Cfa7b1b5a7b3 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 7C636449602097009881& > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sdata=wZgQd0X2xX6ed8y0t > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4O87r66gMlVy%2F8aHqtpwnq8O6w% > > >> 3D&reserved=0 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Conocenos Avant2 en 1 minuto! > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > >> >>>>>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fna01.sa > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>felinks.protec&data=02%7C01%7C%7C859800f0fbdd4084543408d52bf4 > > >> >>>>>>>>> 6f9e%7Cfa7b1 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636463251207266855& > > >> >>>>>>>>> sdata=chGRPGjMNW > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> nMjfD2vsZzKoqSMsvCKMprnmnRTa63cfU%3D&reserved=0 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> tion.outlook.com/?url= > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Favant2.e > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> s%2F%23video&data=02%7C01%7C%7C5f3b122f189e4e0f119b08d51f8a > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 81b0%7Cfa7b1b5a > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0% > 7C0%7C636449602097009881 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> & > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sdata=JK22xVqobAGGnZ > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b8laWESXHS3NA5nLdscBYTEHml7Pk% > > >> >>> 3D&reserved=0> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Este mensaje se dirige > > exclusivamente > > >> a su > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destinatario y > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> puede > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contener > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> información privilegiada o > > >> confidencial. > > >> >>> Si > > >> >>>>>>>>> ha > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recibido > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> este > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mensaje > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> por > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> error, le rogamos que nos lo > > >>comunique > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inmediatamente > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> por > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> esta > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> misma > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vía y > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proceda a su destrucción. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> De la vigente Ley Orgánica de > > >> Protección > > >> >>> de > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Datos > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (15/1999), le > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comunicamos > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> que sus datos forman parte de un > > >> fichero > > >> >>> cuyo > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> responsable es > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CODEOSCOPIC > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> S.A. La finalidad de dicho > > >>tratamiento > > >> es > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> facilitar > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> la prestación > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> del > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> servicio o información > solicitados, > > >> >>> teniendo > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> usted > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> derecho > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> de > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> acceso, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rectificación, cancelación y > > >>oposición > > >> de > > >> >>> sus > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> datos > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dirigiéndose a nuestras oficinas > c/ > > >> Paseo > > >> >>> de > > >> >>>>>>>>> la > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> la > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentación > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> necesaria. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > >> https%3A%2F%2Fna01.safelinks > > >> .protection&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ce246c07a09a44cff420708d52c1a > > >> 6ba2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438 > > >> 794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636463414346965184&sdata= > > >> SpApvoTVow%2BPV3edMbPJGwtkX > > >> fCNW0MJX3hCslC8%2Fs4%3D&reserved=0. > > >> >>>>>>> outlook.com/?url=https% > > >> >>>>>>> 3A%2F%2Fna01.safelinks.protection&data=02%7C01%7C% > > >> >>>>>>> 7C67bd28970d5f42e16e3108d52bff > > >> >>>>>>> 76f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% > > >> >>>>>>> 7C636463298566867427&sdata=%2FJQ > > >> >>>>>>> RwVcC2MM5YrjNPcd832JevthjCxw0Zb%2BnOskyPSM%3D&reserved=0. > > >> >>>>>>>>> outlook.com/?url=htt > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ps%3A%2F%2Fna01.safelinks.protection. > > >> >>>>>>>>> outlook&data=02%7C > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 01%7C%7C859800f0fbdd4084543408d52bf4 > > >> >>>>>>>>> 6f9e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% > > >> >>>>>>>>> 7C636463251207266855&sdata > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> =OnP2EV2bfe3VOHVP% > > >> 2B6HM3LLpJAOWzhx9PrPq5Vers9Y% > > >> >>>>>>>>> 3D&reser > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ved=0 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> .com/?url=https > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> %3A%2F%2Fna01.safelinks. > > protection.outlook > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> &data=02%7C01%7 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> C%7Cca49c65bbd2148ea650d08d52a7397a5% > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% > > 7C63646159830588141 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 2&sdata=hU7rnYM > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SIezodcBPzByuOkArdj% > 2Fm3vc1Btz2bCY2JxI%3D& > > >> >>>>> reserved=0. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/?url=https%3A%2F%2 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>Fna01.safelinks.protection.outlook&data=02% > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7C01%7C%7Cb6a2094e11dd > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> 4e4c496708d527e2d4eb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> C636458777567763335&sdata=VO2y > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> h0RARZiWr4jYbPz8nfsyzyCG2O > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a2KQ%2Blj > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2z%2FLIM%3D&reserved=0. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fww > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> w > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> . > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> codeoscopic.com&data=02%7C01%7C% > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7Cbbcc4f094aec46c8cac208d527b8 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d535%7C > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178dece > e1%7C0%7C0% > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7C636458597162582230&sdata=% > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2BGs4UwGYO8XA6Ca3DU15tlSm3DZL3 > > >> j4Jz9bXSVtkRu4%3D&reserved=0 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos Rovira > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Director General > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> M: +34 607 22 60 05 <607%2022%2060%2005> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.c > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> odeoscopic.com&data=02%7C01%7C% > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7Cbbcc4f094aec46c8cac208d527b8 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d535%7Cf > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee > 1%7C0%7C0% > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7C636458597162582230&sdata=%2 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BGs4UwGYO8XA6Ca3DU15tlSm3DZL3j > > 4Jz9bXSVtkRu > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 4%3D&reserved=0 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Conocenos Avant2 en 1 minuto! > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fava > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>nt2.es%2F%23video&data=02%7C01%7C% > > >> 7Cbbcc4f094aec46c8cac208d > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>5 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 27b8 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d535% > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7C636458597162582230&sdata > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> =Il0uAApioVX8s%2FGpLF6I7n3Z9RVE6lr% > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2F2DRXoDPhY7M%3D&reserved=0> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a > su > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> destinatario > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> y > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> puede > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contener > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> información privilegiada o confidencial. > > >>Si > > >> ha > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> recibido > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> este > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mensaje > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> por > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique > > >> >>>>>>>>> inmediatamente > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> por > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> esta > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> misma > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vía > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> y > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proceda a su destrucción. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección > > >>de > > >> >>> Datos > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (15/1999), > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> le > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comunicamos que sus datos forman parte > de > > >>un > > >> >>>>>>>>> fichero > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cuyo > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> responsable > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> es > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CODEOSCOPIC S.A. La finalidad de dicho > > >> >>>>>>>>> tratamiento es > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> facilitar > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> la > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prestación del servicio o información > > >> >>> solicitados, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> teniendo > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usted > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> derecho > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> de acceso, rectificación, cancelación y > > >> >>> oposición > > >> >>>>>>>>> de > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> sus > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> datos > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dirigiéndose > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a nuestras oficinas c/ Paseo de la > Habana > > >> 9-11, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 28036, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Madrid > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> con la > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentación necesaria. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos Rovira > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > >> https%3A%2F%2Fna01.safelinks& > > >> data=02%7C01%7C%7Ce246c07a09a44cff420708d52c1a6ba2% > > >> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178d > > >> ecee1%7C0%7C0%7C636463414346965184&sdata=01i%2FhAQb% > > >> 2FbhrBxSgCySDM1OULGCIXjLBcav > > >> c8HngjUU%3D&reserved=0. > > >> >>>>>>> protection.outlook.com/?url= > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http%3A%2F%2Fabou > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> t > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> . > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7C% > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7Cbbcc4f094aec46c8cac208d527b8 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d535%7 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178dec > ee1%7C0%7C0% > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7C636458597162582230&sdata=9 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> %2FYyqi%2BYg77E% > > >> 2FcoGt9naXIx24oJV3uK2fwbRB7Ef1 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ec%3D&reserved=0 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos Rovira > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > htt > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> p%3A%2F%2Fabout > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02% > > 7C01%7C%7Cca49c65bbd2148ea6 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 50d08d52a7397a5 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> %7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C63646159 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 8305881412&sdat > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a=CQxWjt8NhfGG%2Flx50us4io9vxwjwx% > > >> >>>>>>> 2FtJbJYfNuWDvBk%3D&reserved=0 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> -- > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> Piotr Zarzycki > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> Patreon: > > >> >>>>>>>> *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > >> >>>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr > > >> >>>>>>>> eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C% > > >> >>> 7C67bd28970d5f42e16e3108d52bff > > >> >>>>>>> 76f7 > > >> >>>>>>>> %7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% > > >> >>>>>>> 7C636463298566867427&sdata=Qln > > >> >>>>>>>> 4DMEp%2Bo3veBGKaU0K2kznZ4qA3gRaOxS75k1T62w%3D&reserved=0 > > >> >>>>>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > >> >>>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr > > >> >>>>>>>> eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C% > > >> >>> 7C67bd28970d5f42e16e3108d52bff > > >> >>>>>>> 76f7 > > >> >>>>>>>> %7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% > > >> >>>>>>> 7C636463298566867427&sdata=Qln > > >> >>>>>>>> 4DMEp%2Bo3veBGKaU0K2kznZ4qA3gRaOxS75k1T62w%3D&reserved=0>* > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> -- > > >> >>>>>> Carlos Rovira > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > >> http%3A%2F%2Fabout > > >> >>>>>>.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7C% > 7Ce246c07a09a44cff420708d52c1a > > >> 6ba2 > > >> >>>>>>%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% > > >> 7C636463414346965184&sdat > > >> >>>>>>a=8OXC3rvTt7969gXZ%2FyVupYooT8jguAL8yvMC6Xq5pcQ%3D&reserved=0 > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> -- > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> Piotr Zarzycki > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> Patreon: > > >> >>>>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > >> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p > > >> >>>>atreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C% > > >> 7Ce246c07a09a44cff420708d52c > > >> >>>>1a6ba2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% > > >> 7C636463414346965184& > > >> >>>>sdata=PriJqbgm%2BFgBod%2BUIGZO5bunPiEAHt5XxtHzRPQGgBA > %3D&reserved=0 > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > >> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p > > >> >>>>atreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C% > > >> 7Ce246c07a09a44cff420708d52c > > >> >>>>1a6ba2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% > > >> 7C636463414346965184& > > >> > > >>>>>>sdata=PriJqbgm%2BFgBod%2BUIGZO5bunPiEAHt5XxtHzRPQGgBA > > %3D&reserved=0>* > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> -- > > >> >> Carlos Rovira > > >> >> > > >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > >> http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me% > > >> >>2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ce246c07a09a44cff420708d52c1a > > >> 6ba2%7Cfa7b1 > > >> >>b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636463414346965184& > > >> sdata=8OXC3rvTt7 > > >> >>969gXZ%2FyVupYooT8jguAL8yvMC6Xq5pcQ%3D&reserved=0 > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > >-- > > >Carlos Rovira > > >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2 > > >Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7C%7Caf4775cf81744f38c00a08d52c51 > > f49b%7Cfa7b1b5 > > >a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636463652865787019& > > sdata=gEpLSWQFC0gdK > > >qRx0gBfmmkIMGtRg31TJs7D6OSgrD0%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > -- Piotr Zarzycki Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
