Hi Alex, Many things to cover here, I agree with some and not with others:
* About the MXML initiative to search a way for more productive HTML layouts, that's very cool. * The repetition in HTML as you said is so cumbersome. The way Flex always handled that was through components, dataproviders, item renderers, and so on. That's what I expect from flex if I want to use it to make an app or website. * -Is this useful? Totally , Is what this project is about and for that reason in MDL set Piotr and I was searching for tablet or list component that use data provider, itemrenderer, etc.. without that royale lost its value and other solutions like Angular or React wins...is what we can offer in the end! * About creating website in this way: We are not there yet, and moreover, people like me don't want that right now. We need a usable UI Set as our first need to enter Royale. This is IMHO critical to understand and we should focus on that to allow people get interest in royale. We need Button, List, Slider, DropBox and more working as a flex component with ease to change style with theming, forms, validations and more. I think that is more important since is what we'll make people join us. About website: We are not waiting anything more for infra. We have green light to publish the actual website. Right now the reason is not published yet is: 1) the need of a Royale first release to update the actual info to match the final versions (to avoid users confusion) and 2) but not as important end content for home and feature pages. * About page speed: You all know that actual WP site is not for production, we will click and export button and we'll get the static and faster site with same look and feel and anims we have right now, and that static html+js+css code will be pushed to royale.apache.org. All of you that have admin access to the WP instance in codeoscopic can try to push the button to generate the actual static site and check the faster performance: Go to "Simply Static" > "Generate" and push "Generate Static Files" button. And you'll get the static version, that's all. As I said hope to come back with a re-read of the thread. Thanks! Carlos 2017-12-22 11:56 GMT+01:00 yishayw <[email protected]>: > I also think this is a great initiative. Regarding SEO there are some > optimizations that can be applied to single page apps as well so maybe it's > worth testing that before we convert it to a multipage. I'm not in front of > the computer but when I am I'll share the links I read, if there's interest > in that. > > > > -- > Sent from: http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/ > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
