Hi Alex, I think we should wait for something more suited for production. At least work on the presentation and have a minimum content.
2018-01-26 18:20 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: > The develop branch is built by our CI server. The results are here: > > http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/ > RoyaleDocs_Stagin > g/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/_site/index.html > > Theoretically, when we merge develop into master, GH pages will process it > and it will show up here: > > https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/ > > We can try a merge now if you want. Would need Andrew's ok before doing > so. Not sure if our partial work in develop is better than the > placeholder in master. > > Thoughts? > -Alex > > On 1/26/18, 3:27 AM, "Gabe Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >I’m trying to find my bearings after following lightly for a couple of > >weeks. > > > >I’m really excited by all the work that’s been going on vis a vis docs > >lately. I think it’s really important work and really glad it’s happening. > > > >How do I view the current status of the work on docs? I see there’s a > >develop branch on the docs repo, but I’m not sure how to actually view > >that. Is there a URL that Jekyll outputs changes to? Is it built locally, > >and if yes how? How is changes actually published by Jekyll to the docs > >GitHub.io site? > > > >Thanks, > >Harbs > > > >> On Jan 26, 2018, at 9:14 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> > >>wrote: > >> > >> OK, I figured out how to generate the ToC from a JSON file > >> (_data/toc.json). Basically, it is a hierarchical structure. Each ToC > >> entry is a JSON Object with a path property and an optional children > >>array > >> of other ToC entries. > >> > >> The title and links are pulled from the site information gathered by > >> Jekyll, so you won't see ToC entries on the page for entries in the > >> toc.json that don't have an actual file. Which also means that if you > >> don't match the path to the actual file name it won't show either. Make > >> sure you have your capital letters and everything correct. > >> > >> I also figured you were asleep at this hour so I did the license sweep. > >> Make sure you sync up any local working copies before making more > >>changes. > >> > >> On 1/25/18, 6:51 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > >> > >>> OK, I saw your other email about more ToC changes coming. I think I am > >>> going to try to generate the ToC. > >>> > >>> -Alex > >>> > >>> On 1/25/18, 6:32 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 1/25/18, 4:11 PM, "Andrew Wetmore" <cottag...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi: > >>>>> > >>>>> I have not been touching the ToC file because it looks very easy to > >>>>>get > >>>>> wrong. > >>>> > >>>> Yeah, I was fiddling with the ToC and thinking the same thing. I'm > >>>> wondering how many more changes to the ToC we'll be doing. If it is > >>>>just > >>>> a few more to implement your proposed ToC, we could just keep the > >>>>current > >>>> way and fix the small things as we find it. If we think we're going > >>>>to > >>>> be > >>>> adding new entries and/or renaming entries, maybe it is worth it for > >>>>me > >>>> to > >>>> try to spend a day making the ToC "generate" from the .MD files. We > >>>> would > >>>> probably dictate the organization of the ToC in a JSON file, but the > >>>> entries would be less error prone. Maybe like: > >>>> > >>>> { "toc": [ "index.md" : [ "welcome/high-level-view.md" : [] , > >>>> "welcome/features-and-concepts.md": [ > >>>> "welcome/features/as3.md" ... > >>>> "get-started.md" : ["get-started/system-requirements.md" ... > >>>> > >>>> Essentially, a hierarchical object that just lists the file names in > >>>>the > >>>> order you want them to appear in the ToC. I think I can get Jekyll to > >>>> generate the ToC by using the page titles. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> I have also not been inserting links from one .md page to another > >>>>> because I am not clear whether we are using relative or absolute > >>>>>links > >>>>> (not > >>>>> sure, for instance, whether there is a performance benefit of one > >>>>>over > >>>>> the > >>>>> other...). > >>>> > >>>> In the .md files, links have to be a full path without the leading > >>>>slash. > >>>> So to link to /welcome/features/as3.md, you would use > >>>> > >>>> [as3](welcome/features/as3.html) > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Also, when we link out from the help docs to another section of the > >>>>> Royale > >>>>> site, or any other resource, we should pop a new browser window, not > >>>>> take > >>>>> the reader away from the help docs. Is there a standard way to > >>>>>declare > >>>>> that > >>>>> when writing a link in markdown? Is it the same as in HTML > >>>>> ("target=_blank")? > >>>> > >>>> I had to look it up. The syntax is: > >>>> > >>>>> [as3](welcome/features/as3.html){:target='_blank'} > >>>> > >>>> I just modified index.md and tested it and it seemed to work. > >>>> > >>>> -Alex > >>>> > >>> > >> > > > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
