I'll try that route and see what I get. I'll be back with my results. 2018-01-26 3:15 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> Hi Carlos, > > I don't know how big the changes you are thinking of and how much time you > have, but you could mock up something in your WP instance or post an image > and I could try to make the changes in the current template. > > Let me know, > -Alex > > On 1/25/18, 4:17 PM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" > <carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote: > > >Hi Alex, > > > >getting up with the last day info. Right, I'll try this week-end to make > >something that looks good. First I have to figure how to work taking into > >account the other threads I read and the way you guys are working. > >Thanks > > > >2018-01-25 0:23 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: > > > >> MIT is fine, as is BSD. But again, if the theme has many parts, it may > >> result in the PMC spending time researching each of the parts. Just > >> because the theme author claims MIT for his work, he might have used > >> third-party works under other licenses that aren't as compatible with > >>the > >> Apache License. > >> > >> I guess my question is this: I don't expect that the look-and-feel of > >>our > >> documentation pages needs much if any animation. IOW, I would think the > >> visuals around the content will be pretty much static. If that's the > >> case, why will it be so difficult to just continue improving the > >>template > >> I put in there? If you want to take a theme and WP and mock up > >>something > >> quickly, that's fine as long as all of the creativity can be considered > >> yours or under a friendly license. But maybe instead of another export > >>of > >> a WP theme, we should just try to mimic that in plain HTML. I think I > >>got > >> pretty close to the royale.a.o look in the docpage.html template. > >> > >> Thoughts? > >> -Alex > >> > >> On 1/24/18, 1:57 PM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos > >>Rovira" > >> <carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> >Hi Alex, > >> > > >> >right, I'm looking for something that is ALv2. Unfortunately almost all > >> >docs themes are MIT license. Is MIT right for us? > >> > > >> >2018-01-24 18:14 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: > >> > > >> >> Hi Carlos, > >> >> > >> >> Right now, the master branch is set up to use the Cayman theme. > >>When I > >> >> took a quick look at Cayman, it appeared to be under Creative > >>Commons, > >> >> which makes it very difficult for us to use. Unfortunately, just > >> >>because > >> >> it is "Open Source" and on GitHub doesn't mean it is compatible with > >>the > >> >> Apache License. That was one reason I put in a docpage.html as the > >> >> initial template for the doc site. If you can find a simple theme > >>that > >> >> isn't under CC, then let's take a look at it, but every third party > >> >>theme > >> >> seems to have lots of pieces and is going to have to get scrubbed > >>which > >> >> takes us time thinking about legal stuff. I believe we can > >> >>incrementally > >> >> add to the initial template or make different templates over time and > >> >>make > >> >> a first-class doc site without having to spend so much time scrubbing > >> >> other people's works. I don't think people are going to care too > >>much > >> >> about how cool our doc site is, at least not right now. I don't > >>think > >> >> there is a rush to make it cool. On the other hand, we do want to > >>make > >> >>a > >> >> good first impression over at royale.a.o, which is why I'm glad you > >>have > >> >> provided something great for that. > >> >> > >> >> My 2 cents, > >> >> -Alex > >> >> > >> >> On 1/24/18, 12:45 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos > >> >>Rovira" > >> >> <carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrov...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> >Hi Alex, for this reason is better to go with a OS GitHub theme that > >> >>only > >> >> >needs to use the colors, fonts and logos from our website. Those > >>where > >> >> >selected by me and are not provided by the WP theme. The other main > >> >>reason > >> >> >is that we need to use something done for that task with the maximum > >> >> >quality. And that is something we can develop ourselves from scratch > >> >> >without invest lots of time. > >> >> > > >> >> >2018-01-24 5:10 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: > >> >> > > >> >> >> Personally, I would be very cautious about WP themes or copying > >> >> >> look-and-feel of other sites. I would like our doc to be > >> >>license-able > >> >> >> under ALv2 and not run into IP and licensing issues. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> -Alex > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On 1/23/18, 3:11 PM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos > >> >> >>Rovira" > >> >> >> <carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrov...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >Hi, > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >I tried to read through this thread, but many mails to catch all > >> >>whats > >> >> >> >happening at the moment, and just want to say a couple of things: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >1.- Regarding TOC, I think it's ok (in a quick review, I should > >> >>work a > >> >> >>bit > >> >> >> >on docs too to see how this works). But as anything, I assume > >>that > >> >> >>it's a > >> >> >> >starting point and we should be working on it a evolving it as we > >> >> >> >experience it. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >2.- Although Flex doc is a good start I want to point as well to > >> >> >>React[1] > >> >> >> >and Angular[2] to compare with what we want to do to get/copy > >>ideas > >> >>on > >> >> >>how > >> >> >> >they are doing things and help to get same level of quality > >>and/or > >> >>even > >> >> >> >improve over it. I use to always reference this two projects > >>since > >> >>are > >> >> >>the > >> >> >> >standard right now in any aspect and we should compare what we do > >> >>with > >> >> >> >those. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >React seems to use Github pages as well and the index/menu > >>systems > >> >> >>seems > >> >> >> >very appropriate. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >3.- I think we should use that kind of layout and not try to > >> >>"emulate" > >> >> >>the > >> >> >> >exact look and feel in our site. I think that would not result in > >> >> >> >something > >> >> >> >cool in the end. To do that I'll go directly the most easy way > >>that > >> >>is > >> >> >>to > >> >> >> >do it in WP instance in no time. We are trying to use Gihub > >>Pages to > >> >> >>get > >> >> >> >something like [2] and that's done with a GitHub pages > >>documentation > >> >> >> >already done. With that in place we only need to change some > >>colors > >> >>(to > >> >> >> >oranges and blues) and fonts, and add royale logo to match > >>website, > >> >>but > >> >> >> >getting something unique for our docs. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >Hope to get soon to this and could help in this task. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >Thanks > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >[1] > >> >> >> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > >> >> >> https%3A%2F%2Freactjs.o > >> >> >> >rg%2Fdocs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com% > >> >> >> 7Cb2e14e4d2a974d55307108d56 > >> >> >> >2b6bb97%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% > >> >> >> 7C636523459331863020&sd > >> >> >> >ata=eJA6clo4TdLGQqSA2KQf400woq2tw0%2BLq%2F0Di8eCnDc%3D&reserved= > 0 > >> >> >> >[2] > >> >> >> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > >> >> >> https%3A%2F%2Fangular.i > >> >> >> > >> >> >>>o%2Fdocs&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com% > >> >> 7Cb2e14e4d2a974d55307108d562b > >> >> >>>6 > >> >> >> b > >> >> >> >b97%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% > >> >> >> 7C636523459331863020&sdata= > >> >> >> >ESznd%2FS49ExgogHbPN9HIF%2B4iHI%2FxwX5Tqw4xnndkSQ%3D&reserved=0 > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >2018-01-23 22:30 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wetmore <cottag...@gmail.com>: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> I have set up 2FA and presume I have to wait a while until > >>GitHub > >> >> >> >>notices. > >> >> >> >> In the mean time I may create another page or two offline... > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 4:41 PM, Andrew Wetmore > >> >><cottag...@gmail.com > >> >> > > >> >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > I have requested my authentication code, but it seems to be > >>slow > >> >> >> >> > arriving...Will wait. > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Alex Harui > >> >> >><aha...@adobe.com.invalid > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > wrote: > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> Hi Andrew, > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> Infra did more checking and says that you haven't enabled > >>2FA > >> >>on > >> >> >>GH > >> >> >> >> which > >> >> >> >> >> is why you are being denied. The links below may help you do > >> >>that. > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > >> >> >> https%3A%2F%2Fhelp.git > >> >> >> >>hub.com%2Farticles%2Fsecuring-your-account-with-& > >> >> >> data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40 > >> >> >> >>adobe.com%7Cb2e14e4d2a974d55307108d562b6bb97% > >> >> >> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178 > >> >> >> > >> >> >>>>decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636523459331863020&sdata= > >> >> Q2ze2F5qsl6bUfvex6mAxuXFbpbtm > >> >> >>>>p > >> >> >> U > >> >> >> >>7Mw2Ntb3pOBY%3D&reserved=0 > >> >> >> >> >> two-factor-auth > >> >> >> >> >> entication-2fa/ > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > >> >> >> https%3A%2F%2Fhelp.gi > >> >> >> >>thub.com%2Farticles%2Fsecuring-your-&data=02%7C01%7Caharui% > >> >> 40adobe.com > >> >> >> %7C > >> >> >> >>b2e14e4d2a974d55307108d562b6bb97%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > >> >> >> cee1%7C0%7 > >> >> >> >>C0%7C636523459331863020&sdata=U%2BkahP6uVxrBuGG6pcvI1QgJqHayIv > >> >> >> cwYQF7WWswi > >> >> >> >>zs%3D&reserved=0 > >> >> >> >> account-with-two-factor-authentication-2fa/> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > >> >> >> https%3A%2F%2Fhelp.git > >> >> >> >>hub.com%2Farticles%2Fproviding-your-2fa-&data=02%7C01%7Caharui% > >> >> >> 40adobe.co > >> >> >> >>m%7Cb2e14e4d2a974d55307108d562b6bb97% > >> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > >> >> >> cee1%7 > >> >> >> >>C0%7C0%7C636523459331863020&sdata=xQLEPxW3yhH% > >> >> >> 2FqIRe2BHn0Ly%2Fm4cki9p4hst > >> >> >> >>4H8XH%2BV8%3D&reserved=0 > >> >> >> >> authentication-code/ > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> -- > >> >> >> >> > Andrew Wetmore > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > >> >> >> http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14 > >> >> >> >>.blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com% > >> >> >> 7Cb2e14e4d2a974d553071 > >> >> >> >>08d562b6bb97%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > >> >> >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636523459331863 > >> >> >> >>020&sdata=Fj6dhqNUJNGm5IhplxseRaJDuC1egP > >> IS7lsxcBt6ejg%3D&reserved=0 > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- > >> >> >> >> Andrew Wetmore > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > >> >> >> http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14 > >> >> >> >>.blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com% > >> >> >> 7Cb2e14e4d2a974d553071 > >> >> >> >>08d562b6bb97%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > >> >> >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636523459331863 > >> >> >> >>020&sdata=Fj6dhqNUJNGm5IhplxseRaJDuC1egP > >> IS7lsxcBt6ejg%3D&reserved=0 > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >-- > >> >> >> >Carlos Rovira > >> >> >> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > >> >> >> http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2 > >> >> >> >Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com% > >> >> >> 7Cb2e14e4d2a974d55307108d5 > >> >> >> >62b6bb97%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% > >> >> >> 7C636523459331863020&s > >> >> >> >data=yO%2FEQwi0y2LQCGV1dnFWypPcOAhYeIrGsXRbLtPcmwI%3D&reserved=0 > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >-- > >> >> >Carlos Rovira > >> >> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > >> >> http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2 > >> >> >Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com% > >> >> 7C5b9bda044c21467b37c008d5 > >> >> >6306d3a5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% > >> >> 7C636523803340777488&s > >> >> >data=t1er5VGrZtk9NKp6m47PmcpCicTy5dReUDJRny5AN%2B0%3D&reserved=0 > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> >-- > >> >Carlos Rovira > >> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > >> http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2 > >> >Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com% > >> 7Ce5c9c51d0e524d97ff2d08d5 > >> >6375988b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% > >> 7C636524279098229179&s > >> >data=5dwzJa%2FcGWd%2BN7sS3b2J%2FSmgRaJ0rRbnRBESq41N2KI%3D&reserved=0 > >> > >> > > > > > >-- > >Carlos Rovira > >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2 > >Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com% > 7Cacb06ad8d95041967c5608d5 > >645236bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% > 7C636525226626178284&s > >data=4k7QlJiRTS190z5TtLiffBGpzHIuwmRttVtaDmabpz0%3D&reserved=0 > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira