Hi, I'm going to take advantage that the release has not yet been created to make this refactor so 0.9.3 comes with this names correctly, hope to have it in the next few hours
2018-04-21 9:04 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > thinking in release 0.9.3 I believe I could make some changes to make the > Jewel API more user ready, since release is what we expect final users will > try and it's a good time to make this kind of changes. Regarding Jewel I > see the following issues: > > * Button: I think people will find more familiar to deal with <j:Button/> > than with <j:TextButton>. Maybe in Basic Button can have more sense, but I > don't see it in Jewel, so I thinking in removing actual Button and rename > TextButton to Button. After 0.9.3 I expect to complete Button with more > needs like ability to handle icons (I suppose this will be a bead), make an > "outline" style, and handle sizes (large, medium, small,...). If you think > in some more needs let me know to add to this TODO (but after 0.9.3) > > * TextField: I find "TextInput" will be a better name, since that will > match flex name and I think is more appropiate. > > I think this will improve people coming from flex, and make the API more > friendly for users > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
