Yes, will look at Alex's fixes tonight. Thanks, Om
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 4:29 PM, Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> wrote: > Om, Alex, > > I'm done for 0.9.3 with this changes, are you still planning on make a > release this days? > > closing for today. > > thanks > > Carlos > > 2018-04-24 17:19 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm going to take advantage that the release has not yet been created to > > make this refactor so 0.9.3 comes with this names correctly, hope to have > > it in the next few hours > > > > > > 2018-04-21 9:04 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> thinking in release 0.9.3 I believe I could make some changes to make > the > >> Jewel API more user ready, since release is what we expect final users > will > >> try and it's a good time to make this kind of changes. Regarding Jewel I > >> see the following issues: > >> > >> * Button: I think people will find more familiar to deal with > <j:Button/> > >> than with <j:TextButton>. Maybe in Basic Button can have more sense, > but I > >> don't see it in Jewel, so I thinking in removing actual Button and > rename > >> TextButton to Button. After 0.9.3 I expect to complete Button with more > >> needs like ability to handle icons (I suppose this will be a bead), > make an > >> "outline" style, and handle sizes (large, medium, small,...). If you > think > >> in some more needs let me know to add to this TODO (but after 0.9.3) > >> > >> * TextField: I find "TextInput" will be a better name, since that will > >> match flex name and I think is more appropiate. > >> > >> I think this will improve people coming from flex, and make the API more > >> friendly for users > >> > >> -- > >> Carlos Rovira > >> http://about.me/carlosrovira > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira >
