Hi Carlos,

I think these components are going to look ugly for a little while longer.  
Also, I have been trying to get them to work for SWF output as well because 
Alina's app uses modules extensively and having the Flash version verify 
interfaces could be a huge time savings.  Eventually, I hope that we can 
replace the views in the emulation components with Jewel views.  The SWF 
version of the Jewel views don't have to look great, it just has to take up the 
same space on the screen.  We just want to make sure we can run most of the 
code paths through the verifier.

If you have time to try mocking the visuals for SWF that would be interesting 
to see.

I'm mainly saying that I don't think blog posts about these components is going 
to look nearly as attractive as the Jewel blog posts

My 2 cents,
-Alex

On 4/25/18, 1:32 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" 
<carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote:

    Hi Alex,
    
    2018-04-25 9:39 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>:
    
    > 120 MX classes compile. Only six MX UI components work at all.  There are
    > examples in examples/mxroyale.  We have not started on Spark.
    >
    
    That sounds very good. Congrats!
    
    
    >
    > In mustella/mxtests is a copy of the flex-sdk checkintest.  The first six
    > tests run without modification (actually a few tests that tested internals
    > were disabled).  That's actually a fair amount of work because to get that
    > much to run we had to emulate Application and states and some containers 
as
    > well.
    >
    > But like I said in another thread.  This is a new effort and I have been
    > distracted by other things and haven't spent nearly as much time on this 
as
    > I had hoped, and wished more existing committers would help.  Getting all
    > of this to compile is a fair amount of work.  Getting it to run is going 
to
    > be a serious effort.  Expecting that we'd get MX and Spark working in this
    > short amount of time is not realistic.
    >
    
    Alex, I think is not realistic to think we can get people on board showing
    Basic examples, or thinks that "doesn't look good". For me, I had a long
    journey to start producing things that looks in a way we can blog, twit and
    so on..., so what you see wasn't worth it, for me is the key factor.
    
    Now I can start to spread the word about this effort in social networks. I
    tried the examples, but need to fix poms to build with maven. I'll do it
    today in order to see it working.
    
    If we can show that work, and make people out there know about it, maybe we
    can bring you more people to help in that effort.
    
    Thanks
    
    Carlos
    
    
    >
    > My 2 cents,
    > -Alex
    >
    > On 4/24/18, 3:40 PM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos
    > Rovira" <carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrov...@apache.org>
    > wrote:
    >
    >     I was wondering if there's some example of the emulation components to
    > show
    >     the work done
    >     Something that aggregates all mx and spark components that we have now
    >     emulated?
    >     I'm interested in watch what we have actually.
    >
    >     thanks!
    >
    >     --
    >     Carlos Rovira
    >     https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
    > http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
    > 7Cc891b5522835498199f008d5aa345bd8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
    > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602064300395249&sdata=M%2BTgzk0xPfCEFDikU2%
    > 2B1QFINpCpLImtJu4qHbjm6da4%3D&reserved=0
    >
    >
    >
    
    
    -- 
    Carlos Rovira
    
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C052d802e5387439f45f308d5aa871bc1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602419622998891&sdata=1BL0npo7ghXprH5aP17Ftt%2BzryTKk9r56uyjdGePObg%3D&reserved=0
    

Reply via email to