Carlos, I didn't want you to move outside the project. I meant that you can use your own forked version and still contribute here, but let's not focus on it.
Harbs did revert your changes because not only his app was broken, but also because there were no proper discussion. Apart of that Alex brings what's the idea behind the Basic. It's not only a UI library, but also pieces which are doing much more things. Harbs said it in the previous email too. Once you start building your app you will notice that. Thanks, Piotr 2018-05-10 11:56 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>: > Hi Piotr, > > If you want that I move on from this project I can do that. And maybe that > will means that this project has something wrong or strange at its Core. > Since I'll be the fourth or five contributor that will move on from this > project due to discrepancies with some PMC members. So maybe those > contributors wasn't the problem. > > What I see really discouraging is that Harbs will revert the change since > is breaking his app. > > A true team will say "hey! something is wrong lets fix it", since is more > easy to fix from the actual point, than revert to that commit. > > But you were clear with your proposal of me to fork Royale in other > project...Just let me know and I'll move on. > > > > 2018-05-10 10:49 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>: > > > +1. > > > > In my opinion it should be done in the following way. > > 1) Refactoring in separate branch > > 2) Announce on dev list > > 3) Wait until someone look into that - if it passed 48h gentle reminder. > - > > The time in this project is rather longer in case of changes. > > > > Btw. I know couple of projects which forked Flex SDK and guys change it > for > > the project purpose. If you really wanted to have it totally separated > you > > can have your own SDK. - It's a pain, but you can move forward faster > > instead of waiting or discuss with others on something. > > > > I really wanted to use Jewel for the new project as part of > > Transpiledactionscript and this what is happening do not help. I'm not > > talking about code changes, but rather time spent on that after those > > changes. > > > > Piotr > > > > On Thu, May 10, 2018, 10:35 AM Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Let me just say that I’m *very* frustrated right now. > > > > > > I’m busy chasing down all kinds of odd issues caused by a refactoring > > that > > > we didn’t agree on. > > > > > > I really don’t have the time to be doing so right now… :-( > > > > > > Carlos, you REALLY should have: > > > a) properly discussed this all *before* you made these changes. > > > b) done this on a feature branch. > > > > > > At this point, I’d like to just revert all the refactoring changes. > > > > > > Harbs > > > > > > > On May 10, 2018, at 9:08 AM, Piotr Zarzycki < > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > In that point I'm feeling that Even if couple of PMC members or > > > committers > > > > have some resistance, changes are being done no matter what. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira > -- Piotr Zarzycki Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
