Ok Harbs, for me that branch should not be a "reverting" branch, but a way to fix the things the refactor causes :
1.- JSONLY: I don't know why that build breaks, and how can I test it localy. If I know I can help fixing that for sure. 2.- ANT: is working or not? doesn't make clear to me. If not works, here I prefer the help of the people that controls ANT, since I'm not 3.- After all that is working 1 (or 1 & 2, is 2 is break), then your application should work without problem in the same way it did. So for me this is not a problem of a refactor, this is only showing some deficiencies in our build system. At the end we should get what you want and what I need to continue Jewel working. Sorry that this is making so much noise and build breaks, but although I admit my mistake in the way I do this, this is arising a problem that was sleeping inside our builds. If someone let me know how I can try to build JSONLY localy I can see what's going on in this maven build, and help (as a team) to fix the actual problems. thanks 2018-05-10 12:40 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: > The only reverting I did was in a feature branch so I can continue > working. I don’t think that’s aggressive at all… > > Harbs > > > On May 10, 2018, at 1:32 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > >> > >> We’re pushing back on these changes and simply standing your ground and > >> claiming others are not being good team members is not fair. > >> > > > > Harbs, you are doing a very aggressive thing reverting my work. A work > that > > was done with several hours. > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
