Please let me know whether you think the merge branch should be merged back 
into develop…

> On Sep 4, 2018, at 11:18 AM, Harbs <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> DataGroup is not an IItemRendererParent any more, so the Jewel DataGroup 
> doesn’t work the way it was being used.
> 
> I based it on DataContainer and change the access code in the view and 
> controller to make it work.
> 
> It looks to me like the whole Jewel playground functions correctly now.
> 
> Let me know what you think.
> 
> Harbs
> 
>> On Sep 4, 2018, at 10:13 AM, Harbs <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> I fixed everything except ComboBox.
>> 
>> I’m not sure why my fix didn’t resolve ComboBox too. Looking into it…
>> 
>> Looking good… :-)
>> 
>>> On Sep 3, 2018, at 10:04 PM, Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi
>>> 
>>> as Piotr said JewelExample is the example to check. Fixing DataGroup should
>>> fix the four sections involved:
>>> 
>>> -TablePlayGround
>>> -DateComponentsPlayGround
>>> -ComboBoxPlayGround
>>> -ListPlayGround
>>> 
>>> just as a hint, I move this lines in MainContent.mxml to the bottom of
>>> ApplicationMainContent, to let the rest of sections render correctly, so
>>> this are declared later and instantiated later, since when running prevents
>>> the rest to work right.
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> Carlos
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> El lun., 3 sept. 2018 a las 20:57, Harbs (<[email protected]>) escribió:
>>> 
>>>> I see the problem.
>>>> 
>>>> I’m out of time for tonight. I’ll work on fixing this in the morning.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Harbs
>>>> 
>>>>> On Sep 3, 2018, at 3:46 PM, Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> The problem here's the changes in DataGroup, we can skip this problem if
>>>> we
>>>>> want for now making Jewel DataGroup be equal to old DataGroup instead of
>>>>> extend basic DataGroup,
>>>>> If not we need to know about the changes in DataGroup and change
>>>>> TBodyContentArea to work with the new changes
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Carlos Rovira
>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>> 
> 

Reply via email to