Hi, AMF/RemoteObject examples working as expected!
I think we can merge in develop, if others have tested other example projects and all is working ok. With all that merged, we can release we can in parallel start conversation about how Basic linking affect Jewel. I have a compilation with current develop to compare and see what's are the actual problems. Carlos El mar., 4 sept. 2018 a las 11:57, Carlos Rovira (<carlosrov...@apache.org>) escribió: > Hi Harbs, > > Jewel all working right!, :) > good work on merging > > I need to test now AMF/RemoteObject > > I revert latest commit since launch.json works ok with maven, what problem > did you find? Is what I use in day-by-day to work with VSCode > > Let's go to test AMF > > thanks > > > El mar., 4 sept. 2018 a las 11:33, Carlos Rovira (<carlosrov...@apache.org>) > escribió: > >> Hi Harbs, >> thanks! I'll be looking at it now. Will be soon reporting >> Carlos >> >> El mar., 4 sept. 2018 a las 10:41, Harbs (<harbs.li...@gmail.com>) >> escribió: >> >>> Please let me know whether you think the merge branch should be merged >>> back into develop… >>> >>> > On Sep 4, 2018, at 11:18 AM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > DataGroup is not an IItemRendererParent any more, so the Jewel >>> DataGroup doesn’t work the way it was being used. >>> > >>> > I based it on DataContainer and change the access code in the view and >>> controller to make it work. >>> > >>> > It looks to me like the whole Jewel playground functions correctly now. >>> > >>> > Let me know what you think. >>> > >>> > Harbs >>> > >>> >> On Sep 4, 2018, at 10:13 AM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> I fixed everything except ComboBox. >>> >> >>> >> I’m not sure why my fix didn’t resolve ComboBox too. Looking into it… >>> >> >>> >> Looking good… :-) >>> >> >>> >>> On Sep 3, 2018, at 10:04 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> >>> >>> as Piotr said JewelExample is the example to check. Fixing DataGroup >>> should >>> >>> fix the four sections involved: >>> >>> >>> >>> -TablePlayGround >>> >>> -DateComponentsPlayGround >>> >>> -ComboBoxPlayGround >>> >>> -ListPlayGround >>> >>> >>> >>> just as a hint, I move this lines in MainContent.mxml to the bottom >>> of >>> >>> ApplicationMainContent, to let the rest of sections render >>> correctly, so >>> >>> this are declared later and instantiated later, since when running >>> prevents >>> >>> the rest to work right. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> >>> >>> Carlos >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> El lun., 3 sept. 2018 a las 20:57, Harbs (<harbs.li...@gmail.com>) >>> escribió: >>> >>> >>> >>>> I see the problem. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> I’m out of time for tonight. I’ll work on fixing this in the >>> morning. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Thanks, >>> >>>> Harbs >>> >>>> >>> >>>>> On Sep 3, 2018, at 3:46 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org >>> > >>> >>>> wrote: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> The problem here's the changes in DataGroup, we can skip this >>> problem if >>> >>>> we >>> >>>>> want for now making Jewel DataGroup be equal to old DataGroup >>> instead of >>> >>>>> extend basic DataGroup, >>> >>>>> If not we need to know about the changes in DataGroup and change >>> >>>>> TBodyContentArea to work with the new changes >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Carlos Rovira >>> >>> http://about.me/carlosrovira >>> >> >>> > >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Carlos Rovira >> http://about.me/carlosrovira >> >> > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
