Hi Alex,

since there's no planned ETA for anyone here (that I know), I could try at
some point to have a minimal Responder functionality in the current working
RO. Does not have sense to duplicate all the code but I think has sense to
see if some little changes can provide the minimal needs.

thanks



El mar., 9 oct. 2018 a las 0:25, Alex Harui (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>)
escribió:

> I think you'll have to wait until someone gets all of the old Flex RO code
> to compile and run.  I'm currently still debugging the compiler, so no way
> it will be ready tomorrow.
>
> It doesn't make sense to try to duplicate all of this code and get it to
> work some other way.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 10/8/18, 3:21 PM, "Carlos Rovira" <carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>     Hi Alex,
>
>     I'm closing for today, but tomorrow I'll need to handle more than one
>     Responder for RemoteObject calls, so each operation/method can have
> it's
>     own responder and create methods for each one in my controllers. with
> the
>     current RemoteObject implementation could you share what could be the
> most
>     quick and easy way to get this while the full RO implementation is on
> the
>     works? Now that I'm starting to grow the app code base I can rely on a
>     result handler full of if-then-else
>
>     Thanks for any help on this
>
>     Carlos
>
>
>
>
>     El lun., 8 oct. 2018 a las 18:52, Carlos Rovira (<
> carlosrov...@apache.org>)
>     escribió:
>
>     > Ok Alex, thanks, didn't know that you have this task to make it work
> RO. I
>     > though you only try to compile it.
>     > That's good to know. I'm trying right now to make a real world app
> and
>     > since I don't have a micro structural IOC framework like Swiz, that
> was
>     > that I use in Flex, I'm trying to structure and organize screens,
>     > controllers, delegates, and so on, and I'm trying to put things as
> easy as
>     > possible so I can refactor more later to something more suited for
> this
>     > task, since I don't have time now to build a framework for this due
> to
>     > reduced time lines.
>     >
>     > If you get this RO proxy way to call backend methods and AsyncToken,
>     > that's what I need to connect with MX RemoteObject in the same way
> we use
>     > to do.
>     >
>     > I'll be waiting for your. progress there
>     >
>     > thanks
>     >
>     > Carlos
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > El lun., 8 oct. 2018 a las 17:28, Alex Harui
> (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>)
>     > escribió:
>     >
>     >> I believe I already said I am working on RemoteObject.
>     >>
>     >> The Flex compiler generates custom code for mx:RemoteObject.  The
> Royale
>     >> Compiler currently does not.  I am working on it.
>     >>
>     >> Thanks,
>     >> -Alex
>     >>
>     >> On 10/8/18, 3:13 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <carlosrov...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>     >>
>     >>     Hi,
>     >>
>     >>     I was experimenting trying to get RemoteObject to proxy method
> calls.
>     >>
>     >>     so instead of doing
>     >>
>     >>     service.send("echo", [name_txt.text]);
>     >>
>     >>     be able to do:
>     >>
>     >>     service.echo(name_txt.text);
>     >>
>     >>     I tried with Proxy class
>     >>
>     >>     (org.apache.royale.utils.Proxy)
>     >>
>     >>     and implementing IEventDispatcher, but compiler throws error:
>     >>
>     >>     Call to a possibly undefined method echo through a reference
> with
>     >> static
>     >>     type RemoteObject.
>     >>
>     >>     It's possible to do something like this? what I'm missing?
>     >>
>     >>     This seems a little enhancement, but it would be cool if we get
> it in
>     >> order
>     >>     to be more near of the normal syntax we all have in our code
> bases.
>     >>
>     >>     thanks
>     >>
>     >>     --
>     >>     Carlos Rovira
>     >>
>     >>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C84a4258241354233aeeb08d62d6c7081%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636746341103394266&amp;sdata=yVx9zWfP496aU9xnOJfjjS%2Flk88UaE0OY5SENAwT%2Fy8%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >
>     > --
>     > Carlos Rovira
>     >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C84a4258241354233aeeb08d62d6c7081%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636746341103394266&amp;sdata=yVx9zWfP496aU9xnOJfjjS%2Flk88UaE0OY5SENAwT%2Fy8%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     >
>     >
>
>     --
>     Carlos Rovira
>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C84a4258241354233aeeb08d62d6c7081%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636746341103394266&amp;sdata=yVx9zWfP496aU9xnOJfjjS%2Flk88UaE0OY5SENAwT%2Fy8%3D&amp;reserved=0
>
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Reply via email to