Carlos,

You can always use branch, make your changes and wait for the proper one
using branch. Some time ago Harbs did it the same as far as I remember.
There is no need to wait if you need something ASAP.

Thanks,
Piotr

wt., 9 paź 2018 o 12:36 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> napisał(a):

> Hi Alex,
>
> since there's no planned ETA for anyone here (that I know), I could try at
> some point to have a minimal Responder functionality in the current working
> RO. Does not have sense to duplicate all the code but I think has sense to
> see if some little changes can provide the minimal needs.
>
> thanks
>
>
>
> El mar., 9 oct. 2018 a las 0:25, Alex Harui (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>)
> escribió:
>
> > I think you'll have to wait until someone gets all of the old Flex RO
> code
> > to compile and run.  I'm currently still debugging the compiler, so no
> way
> > it will be ready tomorrow.
> >
> > It doesn't make sense to try to duplicate all of this code and get it to
> > work some other way.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 10/8/18, 3:21 PM, "Carlos Rovira" <carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >     Hi Alex,
> >
> >     I'm closing for today, but tomorrow I'll need to handle more than one
> >     Responder for RemoteObject calls, so each operation/method can have
> > it's
> >     own responder and create methods for each one in my controllers. with
> > the
> >     current RemoteObject implementation could you share what could be the
> > most
> >     quick and easy way to get this while the full RO implementation is on
> > the
> >     works? Now that I'm starting to grow the app code base I can rely on
> a
> >     result handler full of if-then-else
> >
> >     Thanks for any help on this
> >
> >     Carlos
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >     El lun., 8 oct. 2018 a las 18:52, Carlos Rovira (<
> > carlosrov...@apache.org>)
> >     escribió:
> >
> >     > Ok Alex, thanks, didn't know that you have this task to make it
> work
> > RO. I
> >     > though you only try to compile it.
> >     > That's good to know. I'm trying right now to make a real world app
> > and
> >     > since I don't have a micro structural IOC framework like Swiz, that
> > was
> >     > that I use in Flex, I'm trying to structure and organize screens,
> >     > controllers, delegates, and so on, and I'm trying to put things as
> > easy as
> >     > possible so I can refactor more later to something more suited for
> > this
> >     > task, since I don't have time now to build a framework for this due
> > to
> >     > reduced time lines.
> >     >
> >     > If you get this RO proxy way to call backend methods and
> AsyncToken,
> >     > that's what I need to connect with MX RemoteObject in the same way
> > we use
> >     > to do.
> >     >
> >     > I'll be waiting for your. progress there
> >     >
> >     > thanks
> >     >
> >     > Carlos
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > El lun., 8 oct. 2018 a las 17:28, Alex Harui
> > (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>)
> >     > escribió:
> >     >
> >     >> I believe I already said I am working on RemoteObject.
> >     >>
> >     >> The Flex compiler generates custom code for mx:RemoteObject.  The
> > Royale
> >     >> Compiler currently does not.  I am working on it.
> >     >>
> >     >> Thanks,
> >     >> -Alex
> >     >>
> >     >> On 10/8/18, 3:13 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >     >>
> >     >>     Hi,
> >     >>
> >     >>     I was experimenting trying to get RemoteObject to proxy method
> > calls.
> >     >>
> >     >>     so instead of doing
> >     >>
> >     >>     service.send("echo", [name_txt.text]);
> >     >>
> >     >>     be able to do:
> >     >>
> >     >>     service.echo(name_txt.text);
> >     >>
> >     >>     I tried with Proxy class
> >     >>
> >     >>     (org.apache.royale.utils.Proxy)
> >     >>
> >     >>     and implementing IEventDispatcher, but compiler throws error:
> >     >>
> >     >>     Call to a possibly undefined method echo through a reference
> > with
> >     >> static
> >     >>     type RemoteObject.
> >     >>
> >     >>     It's possible to do something like this? what I'm missing?
> >     >>
> >     >>     This seems a little enhancement, but it would be cool if we
> get
> > it in
> >     >> order
> >     >>     to be more near of the normal syntax we all have in our code
> > bases.
> >     >>
> >     >>     thanks
> >     >>
> >     >>     --
> >     >>     Carlos Rovira
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C84a4258241354233aeeb08d62d6c7081%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636746341103394266&amp;sdata=yVx9zWfP496aU9xnOJfjjS%2Flk88UaE0OY5SENAwT%2Fy8%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >     >
> >     > --
> >     > Carlos Rovira
> >     >
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C84a4258241354233aeeb08d62d6c7081%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636746341103394266&amp;sdata=yVx9zWfP496aU9xnOJfjjS%2Flk88UaE0OY5SENAwT%2Fy8%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >     >
> >     >
> >
> >     --
> >     Carlos Rovira
> >
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C84a4258241354233aeeb08d62d6c7081%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636746341103394266&amp;sdata=yVx9zWfP496aU9xnOJfjjS%2Flk88UaE0OY5SENAwT%2Fy8%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*

Reply via email to