Hi Carlos,

Where did you get that artifact?  I could not find it on Maven Central.  Maybe 
you ran the Mavenizer on a Flex SDK?  If so, the question is whether we want 
Maven users to have to use the Mavenizer.

-Alex

On 10/15/18, 1:38 PM, "Carlos Rovira" <carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote:

    Hi Alex,
    
    I was looking for maven resoucebundle in maven and we have separate
    artifacts. an example:
    
    /org/apache/flex/framework/framework/4.16.0/framework-4.16.0-es_ES.rb.swc
    
    So I think it should not be a problem in maven too, and we can reuse from
    flex :)
    
    Best
    
    
    El dom., 14 oct. 2018 a las 23:56, Alex Harui (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>)
    escribió:
    
    > Hi,
    >
    > I just pushed support for old Flex resource bundles in Royale.  Some
    > people migrating old Flex apps will find it more convenient and may even
    > require that [ResourceBundle] metadata works.
    >
    > The interesting piece of this is that we can use the Flex resource bundles
    > as is.  They don't need to be re-compiled by Royale from .properties 
files.
    >
    > The question for us is about how to deal with downloading these bundles.
    > Right now, I've commented out [ResourceBundle] metadata and the
    > -library-path options that point to the Flex bundles until we figure out
    > where to put them and how.
    >
    > I think for Ant, it is as simple as downloading a Flex SDK and grabbing
    > the bundles.  The Royale build already grabs PixelBender.  The Flex SDK
    > download is big, so it will slow up builds from scratch.
    >
    > For Maven, it is trickier.  I don't think there are Maven artifacts for
    > Flex resource SWCs.  Does anybody know for sure, one way or another?  If
    > not, we might manually publish the SWCs as artifacts.
    >
    > I'm not in favor of copying the Flex properties files into the Royale repo
    > and putting together Ant and Maven builds for them, but if some volunteer
    > wants to do it, I won't object, I just don't want to spend my time doing
    > it, since these files should effectively be immutable.
    >
    > Thoughts?
    > -Alex
    >
    >
    
    -- 
    Carlos Rovira
    
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6e1a35fa0f844363b67908d632de3059%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636752327203767909&amp;sdata=J%2B%2Ff4hcbKOcRyO0HkYsyFv1sVtBAkrRzRzOY4N0qMaw%3D&amp;reserved=0
    

Reply via email to