Hi Carlos,

I do not think Apache Flex or Adobe Flex was ever published as Maven artifacts. 
 The link you referenced only seems to reference poms and not binaries.  There 
are no pom.xml files in the Apache Flex repo.

AIUI, there is this thing called a Mavenizer that can take a Flex SDK and 
generate Maven artifacts.  It is in the flex-utilities repo.  I think it will 
put the artifacts in your internal repository, but I don't think anyone from 
Adobe or Apache Flex has ever tried to push those artifacts to Maven Central.  
I'm not sure what it would take to do that.

So, I'm not sure what the right answer is.

Thanks,
-Alex

On 10/15/18, 3:20 PM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Hi Alex,
    
    I searched on the nexus hosted inner company, but didn't try to find it
    outside. I thought Flex SDK was in maven central as well is not the case?
    For example a quick search shows [1] where I see 4.12 and 4.13 here, and I
    suppose those should have the RBs right?
    
    If is not the case, I think can we upload the latest 4.16.1 to maven
    central?
    
    [1]
    
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmvnrepository.com%2Fartifact%2Forg.apache.flex.framework%2Fflex-framework&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C44e9502768aa447c4e4508d632ec6449%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636752388204185273&amp;sdata=2LH4UAMhn%2BK0J1V5FbkoOObBb4cYLiFs4PIyEy1dIP4%3D&amp;reserved=0
    
    
    El lun., 15 oct. 2018 a las 22:57, Alex Harui (<[email protected]>)
    escribió:
    
    > Hi Carlos,
    >
    > Where did you get that artifact?  I could not find it on Maven Central.
    > Maybe you ran the Mavenizer on a Flex SDK?  If so, the question is whether
    > we want Maven users to have to use the Mavenizer.
    >
    > -Alex
    >
    > On 10/15/18, 1:38 PM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >     Hi Alex,
    >
    >     I was looking for maven resoucebundle in maven and we have separate
    >     artifacts. an example:
    >
    >
    > /org/apache/flex/framework/framework/4.16.0/framework-4.16.0-es_ES.rb.swc
    >
    >     So I think it should not be a problem in maven too, and we can reuse
    > from
    >     flex :)
    >
    >     Best
    >
    >
    >     El dom., 14 oct. 2018 a las 23:56, Alex Harui
    > (<[email protected]>)
    >     escribió:
    >
    >     > Hi,
    >     >
    >     > I just pushed support for old Flex resource bundles in Royale.  Some
    >     > people migrating old Flex apps will find it more convenient and may
    > even
    >     > require that [ResourceBundle] metadata works.
    >     >
    >     > The interesting piece of this is that we can use the Flex resource
    > bundles
    >     > as is.  They don't need to be re-compiled by Royale from .properties
    > files.
    >     >
    >     > The question for us is about how to deal with downloading these
    > bundles.
    >     > Right now, I've commented out [ResourceBundle] metadata and the
    >     > -library-path options that point to the Flex bundles until we figure
    > out
    >     > where to put them and how.
    >     >
    >     > I think for Ant, it is as simple as downloading a Flex SDK and
    > grabbing
    >     > the bundles.  The Royale build already grabs PixelBender.  The Flex
    > SDK
    >     > download is big, so it will slow up builds from scratch.
    >     >
    >     > For Maven, it is trickier.  I don't think there are Maven artifacts
    > for
    >     > Flex resource SWCs.  Does anybody know for sure, one way or
    > another?  If
    >     > not, we might manually publish the SWCs as artifacts.
    >     >
    >     > I'm not in favor of copying the Flex properties files into the
    > Royale repo
    >     > and putting together Ant and Maven builds for them, but if some
    > volunteer
    >     > wants to do it, I won't object, I just don't want to spend my time
    > doing
    >     > it, since these files should effectively be immutable.
    >     >
    >     > Thoughts?
    >     > -Alex
    >     >
    >     >
    >
    >     --
    >     Carlos Rovira
    >
    > 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C44e9502768aa447c4e4508d632ec6449%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636752388204185273&amp;sdata=l2OQ0iefgB1gXwj5ZsyLTDdLZE5RX%2FBMotCDQBkhPZs%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >
    >
    >
    
    -- 
    Carlos Rovira
    
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C44e9502768aa447c4e4508d632ec6449%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636752388204185273&amp;sdata=l2OQ0iefgB1gXwj5ZsyLTDdLZE5RX%2FBMotCDQBkhPZs%3D&amp;reserved=0
    

Reply via email to