Since you’ve validated that it works, it would be great if you can update the
README.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 4/19/19, 5:59 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J" <mark.kessler....@usmc.mil.INVALID>
wrote:
I validated that it worked with Flex and Royale compilation. Overall
it was an easy replacement.
-Downloaded the OpenJDK from [1] and unzipped it into a folder.
-Updated the JAVA_HOME environmental var.
-The system path for the %JAVA_HOME%\bin folder stayed the same since it
was already using a %var% name.
I'm fine with choices, it turns out both the Oracle version and the
Open version are mostly the same anyways. I just think we should update
"Building Royale" docs like the README to include the download location for the
Open version as well. Since the free Royale download should encourage a free
Dependency download vice having the pay license version as the default.
[1]
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjdk.java.net%2F12%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C030e49c0e5784d464e1808d6c4c6dbfd%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636912755708638463&sdata=hMqN%2Bmeb2OtuhTM83dakRxKqUgrl%2FVJPRjUozrapBJY%3D&reserved=0
-Mark K
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2019 12:07 AM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Java newer licensing
IMO, it would be great for volunteers to validate that Royale compiles on
Open JDK and later Java versions so users have a choice of those as well as
Java 8 (for a little while longer), and fix any bugs to make it work on all 3.
It would be best if we didn't have to pick one official version.
