This is something I also ran into while converting my projects. I would be great if we had a class tag to allow generic properties and methods as is the case with MovieClip in flash. Currently, you can get around this by setting the -strict flag to false, but you lose a lot of error checking from the compiler.
I'm hoping we can add something like this in the future since a lot of flash projects often make use of the generic properties and I would like to add this to MovieClip in SpriteFlexjs. FYI Object(indicator_content).animate also works. Kenny On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 5:39 PM Josh Tynjala <[email protected]> wrote: > ActionScript does not provide a mechanism for taking an existing class and > adding new methods or properties to it. > > In this case, I don't think you have any other option than to use bracket > syntax, like indicator_content["animate"]. > > - Josh > > On 2019/05/03 21:08:56, Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> wrote: > > Another more question I just found and don't know how to solve. > > > > if I have a polyfill like Web Animations API that adds "animate" method > to > > any Element object. > > Can someone post an example of an @extern file for a case like this? I > > don't imagine right now how can this be done, and maybe right not it > can't > > be done. > > > > Example code I'm using now with brackets notation is: > > > > indicator_content["animate"]({ <this is an object with animation data to > > pass to animate method> }); > > > > so I want royale user can do instead: > > > > indicator_content.animate({...}); > > > > thanks > > > > El vie., 3 may. 2019 a las 23:03, Carlos Rovira (< > [email protected]>) > > escribió: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I now Greg is busy now with an important update > > > I can try to do it myself if Alex point me to the code I should look, > for > > > me it would be part of the task to make this blog example in the best > way > > > possible. > > > thanks > > > > > > El vie., 3 may. 2019 a las 22:58, Greg Dove (<[email protected]>) > > > escribió: > > > > > >> 'I'm pretty sure externs are not scanned for inject_html. Volunteers > are > > >> welcome to teach the compiler to do so.' > > >> I am happy to look into this sometime in the next few days. Just > trying to > > >> finish up something else first... > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 8:54 AM Alex Harui <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > Hi Carlos, > > >> > > > >> > I'm pretty sure externs are not scanned for inject_html. > Volunteers are > > >> > welcome to teach the compiler to do so. > > >> > > > >> > -Alex > > >> > > > >> > On 5/3/19, 1:50 PM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > Hi, > > >> > > > >> > while putting the pieces together for the blog example I'm > finding > > >> the > > >> > following. > > >> > > > >> > For classes that wraps a js code that is an intrinsic file > needed to > > >> > make > > >> > the code function I think inject_html should work but I'm > trying it > > >> and > > >> > seems this is not working. The code is like this: > > >> > > > >> > package > > >> > { > > >> > /** > > >> > * @externs > > >> > */ > > >> > public class hljs > > >> > { > > >> > /** > > >> > * <inject_html> > > >> > * <script src=" > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdnjs.cloudflare.com%2Fajax%2Flibs%2Fhighlight.js%2F9.12.0%2Fhighlight.min.js&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C868c28fb190b470d90c608d6d00907c6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636925134550849329&sdata=Ly6nMG8kCFvf2Dl4PCohbV8T9MPU%2F7OV2CaYrQNFXnY%3D&reserved=0 > > >> > "></script> > > >> > * <link rel="stylesheet" title="Atom One Dark" href=" > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdnjs.cloudflare.com%2Fajax%2Flibs%2Fhighlight.js%2F9.12.0%2Fstyles%2Fatom-one-dark.min.css&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C868c28fb190b470d90c608d6d00907c6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636925134550849329&sdata=C512YPiiwRTU909ZEV5dOT94FELRDVSqm4mNYt58fLY%3D&reserved=0 > > >> > "> > > >> > * </inject_html> > > >> > */ > > >> > public function hljs() > > >> > { > > >> > } > > >> > > > >> > public static function > highlightBlock(block:Element):void {} > > >> > } > > >> > } > > >> > > > >> > So instead of add the inject_html in the code that calls the > > >> methods in > > >> > this step, I think it should be here > > >> > > > >> > Make this sense? > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > El vie., 3 may. 2019 a las 9:38, Carlos Rovira (< > > >> > [email protected]>) > > >> > escribió: > > >> > > > >> > > Hi Alex, > > >> > > > > >> > > for me is difficult right now think about what would be > better for > > >> > > TypeScript. I think all will depend on how people interact in > the > > >> > following > > >> > > months/years to show us what't the best for Royale in the long > > >> term. > > >> > > I think bringing TS to Royale as a first citizen language will > > >> make > > >> > us > > >> > > more accesible and people will considere us more since TS is > the > > >> > language > > >> > > people choose over AS3 (although I for example like AS3 more > and > > >> if > > >> > we get > > >> > > few things like generics we'll be great to compete with TS), > but > > >> > this is a > > >> > > very complex task, so I know this hardly be done unless > someone > > >> > comes with > > >> > > time and knowledge to make it happen. And if we think about > things > > >> > that are > > >> > > complex and hard to add and see the importance/value it will > > >> bring to > > >> > > Royale I think a WebAssembly target will be over TS since it > > >> clearly > > >> > > enhance the Roayle purpose of generate multiple sources. > > >> > > > > >> > > In the other hand, make TS just to do TypeDefs, again maybe > users > > >> > should > > >> > > express here if it could be needed, I can't say right now how > much > > >> > this > > >> > > could be important for Royale, so maybe time and users will > let us > > >> > know > > >> > > what to do. > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > El jue., 2 may. 2019 a las 22:44, Alex Harui > > >> > (<[email protected]>) > > >> > > escribió: > > >> > > > > >> > >> The word "package" has many meanings. In AS3 it is a way of > > >> > avoiding API > > >> > >> name collisions. AIUI, an AS3 package in SWF code has no > object > > >> or > > >> > >> function representation. It effectively just creates a > longer > > >> > "qualified > > >> > >> name". IOW, in a SWF, if there is a class > "mx.core.UIComponent", > > >> > there is > > >> > >> no "mx.core" object you can iterate to see all of the > classes. > > >> > >> > > >> > >> For Royale's JS output, an AS3 package has an object > > >> representation > > >> > in > > >> > >> debug mode because we use the same pattern as Google > Closure. So > > >> > there > > >> > >> really would be an "mx" Object with a "core" property object > > >> with a > > >> > >> UIComponent function that serves as the constructor. > However, in > > >> > >> production, these package objects are often collapsed, so it > is > > >> > best to not > > >> > >> assume the objects exist. > > >> > >> > > >> > >> Then there are Node/NPM packages and modules and other sorts > of > > >> > >> "packaging". But in this thread I was only referencing AS3 > > >> > Packages. > > >> > >> > > >> > >> Also in this thread I mentioned TypeScript. While Royale > could > > >> > support > > >> > >> TypeScript as Carlos mentioned, as an alternative to writing > > >> AS3, I > > >> > only > > >> > >> mentioned it because the existence of a TypeScript definition > > >> for a > > >> > library > > >> > >> indicates that the library can have a strongly-typed API > surface > > >> > which > > >> > >> means it is highly likely you can create Royale typedefs for > that > > >> > library, > > >> > >> and because I thought that Josh's converter was still > working. > > >> > Supporting > > >> > >> TypeScript as an alternative programming language in Royale > is a > > >> > >> significant chunk of work and is not something I plan to > work on > > >> at > > >> > this > > >> > >> time. But I was only mentioning using TypeScript to generate > > >> > typedefs, > > >> > >> which is a different effort and could be a smaller effort and > > >> give > > >> > us > > >> > >> access to a huge set of typedefs. I have no plans to work on > > >> that > > >> > at this > > >> > >> time either, but I could imagine myself working on that if > there > > >> > was enough > > >> > >> demand for it. > > >> > >> > > >> > >> HTH, > > >> > >> -Alex > > >> > >> > > >> > >> On 5/2/19, 11:24 AM, "Dany Dhondt" > <[email protected]> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > >> > > >> > >> Hi Josh, > > >> > >> > > >> > >> Aren’t most of the packages just functions? > > >> > >> In ES6, you’d import packages as > > >> > >> Import { myFunct, myVar } from ‘my-package’ > > >> > >> In older javascript you’d: > > >> > >> const myPackagePointer = require(‘my-package’) > > >> > >> > > >> > >> So your ‘fun’ example sounds like heaven to me! This is > > >> exactly > > >> > what > > >> > >> we need. > > >> > >> > > >> > >> About Typescript: do we need that at all? I think, but > maybe > > >> > this > > >> > >> goes beyond my technical knowledge, all node packages are > > >> compiled > > >> > into > > >> > >> plain old javascript functions. Typescript is only needed for > > >> > authoring the > > >> > >> packages. Once compiled there’s no trace of Typescript at > all. If > > >> > this is > > >> > >> indeed true, then we shouldn’t bother about Typescript at > all, > > >> and > > >> > just > > >> > >> concentrate on incorporating the pure javascript libs. > > >> > >> > > >> > >> Dany > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Op 2 mei 2019, om 19:57 heeft Josh Tynjala < > > >> > [email protected]> > > >> > >> het volgende geschreven: > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > Just for fun, here's another way that you could create > a > > >> > typedef > > >> > >> for hljs so that the highlightBlock() function is directly > in a > > >> > package > > >> > >> (similar to flash.net.navigateToURL), instead of as a static > > >> method > > >> > on a > > >> > >> class: > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FkhVI&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C868c28fb190b470d90c608d6d00907c6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636925134550849329&sdata=E%2BzcgdC3TLRNC%2FL8IfXSeXQZslQJP7pEMcL5z%2FpcV3g%3D&reserved=0 > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > If you did it this way, you'd need to import it before > you > > >> > can call > > >> > >> the function, like this: > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > import hljs.highlightBlock; > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > Or this should work too, if you prefer: > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > import hljs.*; > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > And then you can call the function directly (without > the > > >> hljs. > > >> > >> prefix): > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > highlightBlock(block); > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > As you can see, the way that you choose to expose a JS > > >> > library to > > >> > >> ActionScript is pretty flexible. Some JavaScript libraries > are > > >> just > > >> > a > > >> > >> function, and some have APIs that work more like classes. > > >> Depending > > >> > on the > > >> > >> library, one way may work better than the other. > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > - Josh > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > On 2019/05/02 17:48:49, Josh Tynjala < > > >> [email protected]> > > >> > >> wrote: > > >> > >> >> Exactly right. When you create a typedef class, you're > > >> > trying to > > >> > >> simulate how you would access the API as if you were writing > in > > >> > plain > > >> > >> JavaScript. You call hljs.highlightBlock() in JavaScript, so > you > > >> > need a > > >> > >> class that works the same way in ActionScript. > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> Another option for organization would be to keep all > of > > >> your > > >> > >> typedefs in a separate folder from your app's source files, > and > > >> > reference > > >> > >> the typedefs folder using the source-path compiler option. > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> - Josh > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> On 2019/05/02 16:23:45, Alex Harui > > >> <[email protected] > > >> > > > > >> > >> wrote: > > >> > >> >>> Hi Carlos, > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> I don’t think hljs is in a package called > "externs". In > > >> > Josh's > > >> > >> example, hljs was in the top-level package. And that's > because > > >> > hljs is > > >> > >> found at runtime off of the global window object, not some > > >> > sub-object > > >> > >> called "externs". So, the hljs.as file containing the > externs > > >> has > > >> > to go > > >> > >> in the root of a source-path, not in some folder called > "externs" > > >> > (which is > > >> > >> why some folks will take the time to create a separate > typedefs > > >> SWC > > >> > so as > > >> > >> not to clutter the root of their application's source > directory). > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> Then instead of "import externs.hljs", it should be > > >> "import > > >> > hljs" > > >> > >> (or shouldn’t be needed at all). > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> HTH, > > >> > >> >>> -Alex > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> On 5/2/19, 9:11 AM, "Carlos Rovira" < > > >> > [email protected]> > > >> > >> wrote: > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> Hi, > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> in my latest commit I added hljs extern class like > > >> Josh > > >> > show > > >> > >> in package > > >> > >> >>> externs in TDJ > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> Then I didn't commit the following since is not > > >> working > > >> > for me: > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> 1.- In HighlightCode class (in utils package TDJ) > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> added: > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> import externs.hljs; > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> changed the method highlightBlock to: > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> COMPILE::JS > > >> > >> >>> /** > > >> > >> >>> * block is the element (WrappedHTMLElement) > inside the > > >> > >> component (the > > >> > >> >>> <code> tag) > > >> > >> >>> */ > > >> > >> >>> public function > > >> > highlightBlock(block:Element):void > > >> > >> >>> { > > >> > >> >>> hljs.highlightBlock(block); > > >> > >> >>> } > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> and running it I get: > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> Uncaught ReferenceError: externs is not defined > > >> > >> >>> at utils.HighlightCode.highlightBlock > > >> > (HighlightCode.as:53) > > >> > >> >>> at > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > WelcomeSection.components.ExampleAndSourceCodeTabbedSectionContent.dataReadyHandler > > >> > >> >>> (ExampleAndSourceCodeTabbedSectionContent.as:138) > > >> > >> >>> at > > >> > >> services.GitHubService.goog.events.EventTarget.fireListeners > > >> > >> >>> (eventtarget.js:284) > > >> > >> >>> at > > >> > Function.goog.events.EventTarget.dispatchEventInternal_ > > >> > >> >>> (eventtarget.js:381) > > >> > >> >>> at > > >> > >> services.GitHubService.goog.events.EventTarget.dispatchEvent > > >> > >> >>> (eventtarget.js:196) > > >> > >> >>> at > > >> > >> >>> services.GitHubService.org > > >> > >> .apache.royale.events.EventDispatcher.dispatchEvent > > >> > >> >>> (EventDispatcher.js:71) > > >> > >> >>> at > > >> > >> services.GitHubService.services_GitHubService_completeHandler > > >> > >> >>> (GitHubService.as:54) > > >> > >> >>> at > > >> > >> >>> org.apache.royale.net > > >> > >> .HTTPService.goog.events.EventTarget.fireListeners > > >> > >> >>> (eventtarget.js:284) > > >> > >> >>> at > > >> > Function.goog.events.EventTarget.dispatchEventInternal_ > > >> > >> >>> (eventtarget.js:381) > > >> > >> >>> at > > >> > >> >>> org.apache.royale.net > > >> > >> .HTTPService.goog.events.EventTarget.dispatchEvent > > >> > >> >>> (eventtarget.js:196) > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> What I'm doing wrong? > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> thanks! > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> El jue., 2 may. 2019 a las 18:02, Carlos Rovira (< > > >> > >> [email protected]>) > > >> > >> >>> escribió: > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>>> Hi Josh, > > >> > >> >>>> > > >> > >> >>>> I think this piece of knowledge you just exposed > here is > > >> > key for > > >> > >> the > > >> > >> >>>> success of Royale. > > >> > >> >>>> > > >> > >> >>>> I'll try to use this in TDJ to experiment with it > and > > >> will > > >> > use > > >> > >> in the blog > > >> > >> >>>> example I plan to do. > > >> > >> >>>> > > >> > >> >>>> thanks! > > >> > >> >>>> > > >> > >> >>>> > > >> > >> >>>> El jue., 2 may. 2019 a las 16:36, Josh Tynjala (< > > >> > >> [email protected]>) > > >> > >> >>>> escribió: > > >> > >> >>>> > > >> > >> >>>>>> Users can't do this, they required that Royale > > >> framework > > >> > devs > > >> > >> add > > >> > >> >>>>> typedefs to the typedefs repo and wait to next SDK > > >> > release. > > >> > >> What does not > > >> > >> >>>>> seems very useful. > > >> > >> >>>>> > > >> > >> >>>>> Users can create their own typedefs from scratch. > > >> > >> >>>>> > > >> > >> >>>>> I just created a quick example for hljs, that > exposes > > >> the > > >> > >> >>>>> highlightBlock() function: > > >> > >> >>>>> > > >> > >> >>>>> > > >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FdIq0&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C868c28fb190b470d90c608d6d00907c6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636925134550849329&sdata=hyGPtFg919vlEreGs9E7OqkqRcSHImOIGt8Mt5FNfaI%3D&reserved=0 > > >> > >> >>>>> > > >> > >> >>>>> Basically, the class needs an asdoc comment with > the > > >> > @externs > > >> > >> tag (this > > >> > >> >>>>> is something that comes from Google Closure > compiler, > > >> > which we > > >> > >> use to > > >> > >> >>>>> create release builds) and the compiler should > handle > > >> the > > >> > rest. > > >> > >> >>>>> > > >> > >> >>>>> As I understand it, you don't even need to create > a SWC > > >> > library > > >> > >> for > > >> > >> >>>>> custom typedefs. Recently, Alex mentioned that the > > >> mxmlc > > >> > >> compiler is smart > > >> > >> >>>>> enough to handle a source file as long as it has > the > > >> > @externs > > >> > >> tag. > > >> > >> >>>>> > > >> > >> >>>>> - Josh > > >> > >> >>>>> > > >> > >> >>>>> On 2019/05/02 09:34:37, Carlos Rovira < > > >> > [email protected]> > > >> > >> wrote: > > >> > >> >>>>>> Hi, > > >> > >> >>>>>> > > >> > >> >>>>>> to sumarize (let me know if I'm wrong), the > current > > >> ways > > >> > to > > >> > >> integrate an > > >> > >> >>>>>> existing library are 3: > > >> > >> >>>>>> > > >> > >> >>>>>> 1.- access vía brackets notation: This is the most > > >> easy > > >> > and > > >> > >> direct, an > > >> > >> >>>>>> example is TourDeJewel in class > utils.HighlightCode > > >> > >> >>>>>> > > >> > >> >>>>>> var hljs:Object = window["hljs"]; > > >> > >> >>>>>> hljs["highlightBlock"](block); > > >> > >> >>>>>> > > >> > >> >>>>>> but this one is not what we really want since we > are > > >> > going > > >> > >> with Roayle > > >> > >> >>>>> and > > >> > >> >>>>>> AS3 to get type checking and strong typing. So > this, > > >> > although > > >> > >> useful is > > >> > >> >>>>> not > > >> > >> >>>>>> what we really want to use in out Apps, but since > we > > >> > want to > > >> > >> maintain > > >> > >> >>>>> the > > >> > >> >>>>>> dynamic aspect of the language it could be very > useful > > >> > >> sometimes > > >> > >> >>>>>> > > >> > >> >>>>>> 2.- using typedefs > > >> > >> >>>>>> > > >> > >> >>>>>> This will be the next step to use a real type and > dot > > >> > >> notation, but > > >> > >> >>>>> seems > > >> > >> >>>>>> not easy or direct. > > >> > >> >>>>>> Users can't do this, they required that Royale > > >> framework > > >> > devs > > >> > >> add > > >> > >> >>>>> typedefs > > >> > >> >>>>>> to the typedefs repo and wait to next SDK release. > > >> What > > >> > does > > >> > >> not seems > > >> > >> >>>>> very > > >> > >> >>>>>> useful. > > >> > >> >>>>>> > > >> > >> >>>>>> In the other hand we'll need to know how to extend > > >> > current > > >> > >> typedefs > > >> > >> >>>>> since > > >> > >> >>>>>> don't know if we have docs about this. Until now I > > >> added > > >> > to > > >> > >> "missing.js" > > >> > >> >>>>>> file fo now, but this doesn't seems a valid path > since > > >> > it lacks > > >> > >> >>>>>> organization, separation, and a way for all people > > >> > >> contributing to know > > >> > >> >>>>> wha > > >> > >> >>>>>> we have, what can be added and where, if not we'll > > >> find > > >> > in > > >> > >> time lots of > > >> > >> >>>>>> code very difficult to maintain. > > >> > >> >>>>>> > > >> > >> >>>>>> Yishay and Josh talked about to use TypeScript, > but > > >> > seems that > > >> > >> is > > >> > >> >>>>> already > > >> > >> >>>>>> explored by Josh but not a valid path since will > be > > >> very > > >> > >> difficult to > > >> > >> >>>>>> maintain. > > >> > >> >>>>>> > > >> > >> >>>>>> 3.- wrapping libraries > > >> > >> >>>>>> > > >> > >> >>>>>> This is how we did with MDL. This will be > recommended > > >> > when we > > >> > >> want to > > >> > >> >>>>>> integrate existing libraries with Royale to make > it > > >> work > > >> > with > > >> > >> our APIs > > >> > >> >>>>> in a > > >> > >> >>>>>> more seamless way. But the problems is that this > is > > >> very > > >> > >> laborious. Can > > >> > >> >>>>> be > > >> > >> >>>>>> useful for some concrete libraries and we should > do > > >> when > > >> > >> needed (the > > >> > >> >>>>> case > > >> > >> >>>>>> is MDL). But the problem is that this not solve > the > > >> > problem of > > >> > >> our users > > >> > >> >>>>>> that need to integrate a existing library > themselves > > >> in a > > >> > >> quick way. > > >> > >> >>>>>> > > >> > >> >>>>>> Let me know if you know other way. > > >> > >> >>>>>> > > >> > >> >>>>>> For me method 1, is ok to do the work, but doesn't > > >> make > > >> > us > > >> > >> justice. > > >> > >> >>>>>> method 2 should be the main one if there's a fast > and > > >> > easy > > >> > >> way... I'm > > >> > >> >>>>>> missing something here? Can users create typedefs > > >> > themselves? > > >> > >> >>>>>> method 3 can be useful for us or for users (doing > > >> their > > >> > own > > >> > >> libs, and > > >> > >> >>>>>> eventually can share with us to add to official > royale > > >> > repo > > >> > >> and sdk) > > >> > >> >>>>>> but is something not fast at all and not as > convenient > > >> > and > > >> > >> direct as > > >> > >> >>>>> method > > >> > >> >>>>>> 2, and will require maintenance as libs change. > > >> > >> >>>>>> > > >> > >> >>>>>> Could we agree that this is the currently > available > > >> ways > > >> > in > > >> > >> Royale now > > >> > >> >>>>> to > > >> > >> >>>>>> use external JS libs? > > >> > >> >>>>>> > > >> > >> >>>>>> thanks > > >> > >> >>>>>> > > >> > >> >>>>>> -- > > >> > >> >>>>>> Carlos Rovira > > >> > >> >>>>>> > > >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C868c28fb190b470d90c608d6d00907c6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636925134550849329&sdata=Y4KEWA%2BiX8w0X8ERfqU5%2FzVlAoEIm8XeEkCowIeRC4Y%3D&reserved=0 > > >> > >> >>>>>> > > >> > >> >>>>> > > >> > >> >>>> > > >> > >> >>>> > > >> > >> >>>> -- > > >> > >> >>>> Carlos Rovira > > >> > >> >>>> > > >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C868c28fb190b470d90c608d6d00907c6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636925134550859338&sdata=0jc3vowPhWNFT3kVOO40WG55yfBxqosrg10bfeckpDE%3D&reserved=0 > > >> > >> >>>> > > >> > >> >>>> > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> -- > > >> > >> >>> Carlos Rovira > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C868c28fb190b470d90c608d6d00907c6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636925134550859338&sdata=0jc3vowPhWNFT3kVOO40WG55yfBxqosrg10bfeckpDE%3D&reserved=0 > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > -- > > >> > > Carlos Rovira > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C868c28fb190b470d90c608d6d00907c6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636925134550859338&sdata=0jc3vowPhWNFT3kVOO40WG55yfBxqosrg10bfeckpDE%3D&reserved=0 > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > Carlos Rovira > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C868c28fb190b470d90c608d6d00907c6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636925134550859338&sdata=0jc3vowPhWNFT3kVOO40WG55yfBxqosrg10bfeckpDE%3D&reserved=0 > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Carlos Rovira > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > >
