Well, my PAYG philosophy says that the compiler would not generate a noscript 
tag so that we can save a few bytes for those who can safely assume that their 
users are running JS.  The compiler already supports an -html-template option 
where you specify your own template and the compiler fills in a few slots, so 
folks who want a <noscript> can use a custom template and thus customize what 
the <noscript> says.

If you want to post an example of how to use the -html-template option to 
implement a noscript tag in a Royale app, that would be great.

-Alex

On 2/5/20, 1:59 PM, "QA" <flexcapaci...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Visited 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C04d6243e688a4a7631e908d7aa869d0c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637165367446693874&amp;sdata=EyUl3R5S362nuLx3GKy7opI1L1YirLI6A%2BzLduL71S4%3D&amp;reserved=0
 with JavaScript disabled and noticed 
    some of the content wasn't visible. Would it be possible to add a 
    noscript 
    
<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdeveloper.mozilla.org%2Fen-US%2Fdocs%2FWeb%2FHTML%2FElement%2Fnoscript&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C04d6243e688a4a7631e908d7aa869d0c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637165367446693874&amp;sdata=iQqA27lc8H6sZUGog75%2FuDFwwZutX9%2Bg6gasP0Ub%2Boo%3D&amp;reserved=0>
 
    message?
    
    Jude
    
    

Reply via email to