I don't think Jude is talking about using <noscript> in a Royale app. I think he's saying that the official Apache Flex homepage (or is that a typo? maybe it's the Royale site) requires JavaScript and should have a fallback <noscript>.
-- Josh Tynjala Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 6:10 PM Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote: > Well, my PAYG philosophy says that the compiler would not generate a > noscript tag so that we can save a few bytes for those who can safely > assume that their users are running JS. The compiler already supports an > -html-template option where you specify your own template and the compiler > fills in a few slots, so folks who want a <noscript> can use a custom > template and thus customize what the <noscript> says. > > If you want to post an example of how to use the -html-template option to > implement a noscript tag in a Royale app, that would be great. > > -Alex > > On 2/5/20, 1:59 PM, "QA" <flexcapaci...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Visited > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C04d6243e688a4a7631e908d7aa869d0c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637165367446693874&sdata=EyUl3R5S362nuLx3GKy7opI1L1YirLI6A%2BzLduL71S4%3D&reserved=0 > with JavaScript disabled and noticed > some of the content wasn't visible. Would it be possible to add a > noscript > < > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdeveloper.mozilla.org%2Fen-US%2Fdocs%2FWeb%2FHTML%2FElement%2Fnoscript&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C04d6243e688a4a7631e908d7aa869d0c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637165367446693874&sdata=iQqA27lc8H6sZUGog75%2FuDFwwZutX9%2Bg6gasP0Ub%2Boo%3D&reserved=0> > > message? > > Jude > > > >
